The use of indicators in environmental policy appraisal: lessons from the design and evolution of water security policy measures

被引:0
作者
Howlett, Michael P. [1 ,2 ]
Cuenca, Janet S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, 469C Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore 259772, Singapore
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Burnaby, BC, Canada
关键词
Policy formulation; policy indicators; water policy; public policy; policy-making; POVERTY; GOVERNANCE; FRAMEWORKS; RESOURCES; SCIENCE; AFRICA; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2016.1207507
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Drawing up environmental policy options is a complex activity which involves defining and weighing the merits and risks of various alternative courses of action governments could pursue. In its modern version, this task typically involves formal policy analysis or policy appraisal', that is, policy work specifically undertaken to generate and evaluate policy options in order to address problems or issues on a policy agenda. Indicators play a powerful but under-investigated role in this process. To shed light on this issue, the paper conducts a case study of the design and evolution of policy indicators in water security policy formulation, examining both their utilization and impact. The paper documents the origins of water security policy indicators; assesses their relevance and influence in policy formulation and identifies the reasons for the emergence of certain preferred indices, despite their having several well-known limitations. In particular, the discussion flags the significance of the political advantages surrounding their ease of use and interpretation, rather than their technical merits, as a key factor affecting the continued utilization and influence of specific indicators in environmental policy and planning.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 243
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, OECD Environment Monographs, P83
  • [2] Asian Development Bank, 2013, Asian Water Development Outlook
  • [3] Balint B. E., 2002, INDICATORS MEASUREME
  • [4] Brown A., 2011, 106 U ARK
  • [5] Chenoweth J., REASSESSMENT INDICAT
  • [6] Cook S., 3 CGIAR
  • [7] Cortés Ana Elizabeth, 2012, Obras y Proyectos, P57
  • [8] International Initiatives for Water Policy Assessment: A Review
    De Stefano, Lucia
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2010, 24 (11) : 2449 - 2466
  • [9] Feitelson E., 2002, WATER POL, V4, P263, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00029-6
  • [10] Feldman Martha., 1989, ORDER DESIGN INFORM