Comparative efficacy of oral extended-release hydromorphone and immediate-release hydromorphone in patients with persistent moderate to severe pain: Two randomized controlled trials

被引:24
作者
Grosset, AB
Roberts, MS
Woodson, ME
Shi, MG
Swanton, RE
Reder, RF
Buckley, BJ
机构
[1] N Idaho Canc Ctr, Coeur dAlene, ID 83814 USA
[2] Hematol & Oncol Associates, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Hematol Oncol Consultants Inc, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Purdue Pharma LP, Stamford, CT USA
关键词
analgesics; opioid; hydromorphone; extended-release; pain;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.10.008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover studies with identical designs evaluated the efficacy of oral extended-release hydromorphone (HHER) administered q24h compared with immediate-release hydromorphone (HHIR) dosed four times daily in patients with persistent moderate to severe Pain. Patients titrated to a stable HHER dose were randomized to individualized doses of HHER or HHIR for 3 to 7 days before crossover to the second treatment. Primary efficacy end point was the mean of average pain intensity (API) scores, rated on a 0- to 10-point numeric scale, over the last 2 days before the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics day of each double-blind period. Difference between treatments (HHER - HHIR) in study I was 0.17 with a 90% confidence interval (CI) (-0.01, 0.34); in study 2, difference was 0.07 with a 90% CI (-0.12, 0.26). There were no significant differences between treatments in API scores or amount of rescue medication used at any time interval within the 24-hour dosing Period. No reduction in pain control occurred in patients administered HHER at the end of the 24-hour dosing period. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were opioid-related. In these studies, HHER administered q24h and HHIR dosed four times daily provided comparable analgesia at an equivalent total daily dose. (c) 2005 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 594
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
JACOX A, 1994, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL, V3, P39
[12]   SOURCES OF VARIATION IN ANALGESIC RESPONSES IN CANCER-PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN RECEIVING MORPHINE [J].
KAIKO, RF ;
WALLENSTEIN, SL ;
ROGERS, AG ;
HOUDE, RW .
PAIN, 1983, 15 (02) :191-200
[13]   Drug therapy: Pharmacologic treatment of cancer pain [J].
Levy, MH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (15) :1124-1132
[14]  
MORIARTY M, 1999, J CLIN RES, V2, P1
[15]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF HYDROMORPHONE AFTER INTRAVENOUS, PERORAL AND RECTAL ADMINISTRATION TO HUMAN-SUBJECTS [J].
PARAB, PV ;
RITSCHEL, WA ;
COYLE, DE ;
GREGG, RV ;
DENSON, DD .
BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 1988, 9 (02) :187-199
[16]  
PATT RB, 1999, EVALUATION TREATMENT, P377
[17]  
Portenoy R K, 1989, Oncology (Williston Park), V3, P25
[18]   THE NATURE OF OPIOID RESPONSIVENESS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR NEUROPATHIC PAIN - NEW HYPOTHESES DERIVED FROM STUDIES OF OPIOID INFUSIONS [J].
PORTENOY, RK ;
FOLEY, KM ;
INTURRISI, CE .
PAIN, 1990, 43 (03) :273-286
[19]  
PORTENOY RK, 1991, PRIM CARE CANC MAY, P24
[20]   HYDROMORPHONE LEVELS AND PAIN CONTROL IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE CHRONIC PAIN [J].
REIDENBERG, MM ;
GOODMAN, H ;
ERLE, H ;
GRAY, G ;
LORENZO, B ;
LEIPZIG, RM ;
MEYER, BR ;
DRAYER, DE .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1988, 44 (04) :376-382