Bringing the Simple View of Reading to the clinic: Relationships between oral and written language skills in a clinical sample

被引:19
作者
Ebert, Kerry Danahy [1 ]
Scott, Cheryl M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Assessment; Children; Dyslexia; Language disorders; Literacy; Reading; School-age; SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN; COMPREHENSION; DISABILITIES; DYSLEXIA; HYPOTHESIS; IMPAIRMENT; DISORDERS; KNOWLEDGE; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Simple View of Reading (SVR) predicts subtypes of reading disorder based on weaknesses in word recognition, listening comprehension, or both. This practice-based research study explores predictions of the SVR within a clinical practice setting. Method: The study is a retrospective analysis of 112 assessment records from school-aged children (aged 6.0-16.7) referred for speech-language evaluation. Available scores within four areas (listening comprehension, word recognition, reading comprehension, and oral expression) were extracted and then converted to composites. Composite scores were used to categorize children into SVR subtypes. We examined the distribution of children across subtypes and the relationships among the four constructs. Results: Children were distributed across all SVR subtypes, but few had impairments only in word recognition. Children with impairments in listening comprehension or word recognition showed poorer reading comprehension than those that did not, but there was imperfect prediction of reading comprehension impairment at an individual level. There were more significant correlations among constructs for younger children. Oral expression and listening comprehension were closely related across analyses. Conclusions: The SVR is a clinically useful model for capturing variation and explaining relationships among oral and written language in school-age children. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 160
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Not all reading disabilities are alike [J].
Aaron, PG ;
Joshi, M ;
Williams, KA .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1999, 32 (02) :120-137
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GRAY ORAL READING TE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PPVT 4 PEABODY PICTU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WHAT IS DYSL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, WOODCOCK READING MAS
[6]  
Applegate M.D., 2008, The critical reading inventory: Assessing students' reading and thinking, V2nd
[7]  
Bear D., 2008, Words their Way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling, V4th
[8]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[9]  
Bishop D.V.M., 2003, Test of Reception of Grammar2 (T.R.O.G, Swedish version, 2009
[10]   Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? [J].
Bishop, DVM ;
Snowling, MJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (06) :858-886