The holdout problem and urban sprawl Experimental evidence

被引:20
作者
Cadigan, John [2 ]
Schmitt, Pamela [1 ]
Shupp, Robert [3 ]
Swope, Kurtis [1 ]
机构
[1] USN Acad, Dept Econ, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
[2] Gettysburg Coll, Dept Econ, Gettysburg, PA 17325 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Holdout problem; Land assembly; Urban sprawl; ULTIMATUM GAMES; INFORMATION; FAIRNESS; REORGANIZATION; PRIVATE; STRIKES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jue.2010.08.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Conventional wisdom as well as economic theory suggests It is more costly to reassemble fragmented land due to transactions costs and strategic bargaining costs Both costs are expected to increase with the number of sellers Inefficient allocation of land resources may result including property entropy (Parisi 2002) urban sprawl (Miceli and Sirmans 2007) and deteriorating inner cities Given the difficulty of observing actual values attached by buyers and sellers to land little empirical evidence exists to sup port the conventional wisdom and theoretical work We use experimental methods to examine transactions costs and strategic bargaining costs in a land assembly market game with one buyer 1-4 sellers and complementary exchanges The buyer s final earnings vary inversely with the number of sellers cete ris paribus indicating an incentive to purchase consolidated land Delay costs reduce holdout but result in lower payoffs for both buyers and sellers Competition between sellers reduces holdout and the buyer s total purchase price Published by Elsevier Inc
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 81
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Ockenfels, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :166-193
[2]   Claimholder Incentive Conflicts in Reorganization: The Role of Bankruptcy Law [J].
Brown, David T. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1989, 2 (01) :109-123
[3]   An Experimental Study of the Holdout Problem in a Multilateral Bargaining Game [J].
Cadigan, John ;
Schmitt, Pamela ;
Shupp, Robert ;
Swope, Kurtis .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2009, 76 (02) :444-457
[4]   ULTIMATUMS, DICTATORS AND MANNERS [J].
CAMERER, C ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (02) :209-219
[5]   HOLDOUTS AND FREE RIDERS [J].
COHEN, L .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1991, 20 (02) :351-362
[6]  
CRAMTON PC, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P100
[7]   Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study [J].
Croson, RTA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1996, 30 (02) :197-212
[8]  
Datta S., 1995, J FINANC RES, V18, P15
[9]   ON THE LAND ASSEMBLY PROBLEM [J].
ECKART, W .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1985, 18 (03) :364-378
[10]   A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation [J].
Fehr, E ;
Schmidt, KM .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (03) :817-868