Performance Characterization of Computed Radiography based Mammography Systems

被引:0
作者
Singh, Abhinav [1 ]
Desai, Nikunj [1 ]
Valentino, Daniel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] iCR Co Inc, Torrance, CA 90505 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING | 2010年 / 7622卷
关键词
Computed Radiography; Mammography; Modulation Transfer Function; Noise Power Spectrum; Detective Quantum Efficiency; Photomultiplier tube; CDMAM; 3.4; Phantom; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1117/12.844650
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Computed Radiography (CR) is a cost-effective technology for digital mammography. In order to optimize the quality of images obtained using CR Mammography, we characterized the effect on image quality of the electro-optical components of the CR imaging chain. The metrics used to assess the image quality included the Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR), Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), Noise Power Spectrum (NPS), Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE) and Contrast Detail Response Phantom (CDMAM 3.4 Artinis Medical Systems). An 18x24 cm high-resolution granular phosphor imaging plate (AGFA MM3.0) was used to acquire the images. Contrast detail was measured using a GUI developed for the CDMAM phantom that was scored by independent observers. The range of theoretically acceptable values measured for the CR laser was (5-36) mW and voltage range for PMT's was (4-8) V. The light detection amplifier was investigated, and the optimal Laser Power and PMT gain used for scanning was measured. The tools that we used (CNR, MTF, NPS, DQE and Contrast-detail phantom) provided an effective means of selecting optimal values for the electro-optical components of the system. The procedure enabled us to obtain good quality CR mammograms that have less noise and improved contrast.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Simple method for modulation transfer function determination of digital imaging detectors from edge images
    Buhr, E
    Günther-Kohfahl, S
    Neitzel, U
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2003, 5030 : 877 - 884
  • [2] Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control
    Carton, AK
    Vandenbroucke, D
    Struye, L
    Maidment, ADA
    Kao, YH
    Albert, M
    Bosmans, H
    Marchal, G
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1684 - 1695
  • [3] DESAI N, 2010, P SPIE
  • [4] A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography
    Evans, DS
    Workman, A
    Payne, M
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (01) : 117 - 135
  • [5] Performance evaluation of a "dual-side read" dedicated mammography computed radiography system
    Fetterly, KA
    Schueler, BA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (07) : 1843 - 1854
  • [6] Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems
    Flynn, MJ
    Samei, E
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) : 1612 - 1623
  • [7] IEC 62220-1, 2003, 622201 IEC
  • [8] *IECCEI, 2007, 6222012 IECCEI
  • [9] Measurement of the Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray imaging devices according to the standard IEC 62220-1
    Illers, H
    Buhr, E
    Bergmann, D
    Hoeschen, C
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 5368 : 177 - 187
  • [10] KARSEMEIJJER, 1996, P 3 INT WORKSH DIG M, V32, P155