Consistency of performance on the functional capacity assessment - Static strength and dynamic endurance

被引:6
|
作者
Lee, GKL [1 ]
Chan, CCH [1 ]
Hui-Chan, CWY [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
performance consistency; functional capacity evaluation; Baltimore therapeutic equipment primus; static strength; dynamic endurance;
D O I
10.1097/00002060-200103000-00007
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the degree of consistency in a subject's performance in physical strength and endurance. Design: Thirty healthy men, aged 19 to 26 yr, were recruited to participate in protocols to assess static strength and dynamic endurance tests on their upper limbs with the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Primus, Retests were conducted 7 days after the initial test. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.71 to 0.97 and 0.32 to 0.90 for static and dynamic endurance strengths, respectively. These results indicated that the consistency of the subjects' performance across occasions was high for testing static strength, although it was more varied for testing endurance strength. Conclusions: Higher consistency was observed among subjects in the assessment of static strength than dynamic endurance strength. The range of motion traveled by the limb, speed of performance, and ergonomic design of attachments seemed to confound the subjects' performance on the instrument. Stringent assessment protocols, ergonomically designed hardware, and clear instructions and practice trials before the formal testing were essential to maximize the subjects' consistency of performance. The results of this study were applicable and generalized to other performance-based instruments for physical and functional capacity evaluation and work simulators.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Measurement Properties of Performance-Based Assessment of Functional Capacity
    Douglas P. Gross
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2004, 14 : 165 - 174
  • [2] Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity
    Gross, DP
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 14 (03) : 165 - 174
  • [3] Trunk static and dynamic sagittal endurance in healthy young Nigerian adults
    Mbada, Chidozie Emmanuel
    Dedeke, Adeyemi Gabriel
    ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2015, 23 (04) : 253 - 261
  • [4] Inheritance of static and dynamic arm strength and some of its determinants
    Thomis, MAI
    Beunen, GP
    Van Leemputte, M
    Maes, HH
    Blimkie, CJ
    Claessens, AL
    Marchal, G
    WIllems, E
    Vlietinck, RF
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 163 (01): : 59 - 71
  • [5] Static strength and physical work capacity of agricultural labourers in the central plain of Thailand
    Mamansari, DU
    Salokhe, VM
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1996, 27 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [6] Effect of dynamic and static strength training on hormonal activity in elite boxers
    Aggon, Eser
    Agirbas, Ozturk
    Alp, Hamit Hakan
    Ucan, Izzet
    Gursoy, Recep
    Hackney, Anthony C.
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2020, 12 (03) : 1 - 10
  • [7] Developing Research on Performance-Based Functional Work Assessment: Report on the First International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting
    M. F. Reneman
    R. Soer
    D. P. Gross
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2013, 23 : 513 - 515
  • [8] Developing Research on Performance-Based Functional Work Assessment: Report on the First International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting
    Reneman, M. F.
    Soer, R.
    Gross, D. P.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2013, 23 (04) : 513 - 515
  • [9] Assessment of damage level in materials by the scatter of elastic characteristics and static strength
    Lebedev A.A.
    Makovetskii I.V.
    Muzyka N.R.
    Volchek N.L.
    Shvets V.P.
    Strength of Materials, 2006, 38 (2) : 109 - 116
  • [10] Functional capacity assessment: Influence of behavioral and environmental factors
    Rudy, TE
    Lieber, SJ
    Boston, JR
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 1996, 6 (03) : 277 - 288