Evaluation outcomes of a knowledge translation platform: a structure for support and exchange in prevention

被引:6
|
作者
Pettman, Tahna Lee [1 ]
Armstrong, Rebecca [1 ]
Johnson, Shae [1 ]
Love, Penelope [2 ]
Gill, Timothy [3 ]
Coveney, John [4 ]
Swinburn, Boyd [5 ]
Allender, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2020年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
knowledge translation; evidence-informed practice; exchange; networks; OBESITY PREVENTION; AUSTRALIA; PROGRESS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1332/174426418X15260526569269
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Obesity prevention is an urgent public health priority that requires action at multiple levels. Collaboration between academics, policy and practice is necessary to ensure best-practice implementation. A national knowledge translation and exchange (KT) platform, the Collaboration of Community-based Obesity Prevention Sites (CO-OPS), was delivered and evaluated over three years (2013-15). A mixed-methods evaluation used communications and website data, knowledge-brokering data, event evaluations, interviews and tracer searches to assess process (reach, delivery, quality, cost, uptake) and impact (use of tools/resources, networking, improvements in practice). Results included: 1) average 27% yearly membership growth (330 new members per year) in response to KT activities including tailored communications, stakeholder engagement, knowledge brokering and networking opportunities; 2) sustained website use with approximately 1200 visits/month and 73% unique visitors; and high access to networking and professional development information (120 hits/month), and best practice guidelines (60 hits/month); 3) higher uptake of face-to-face interactive strategies (for example, workshops) than online interactive strategies (for example, knowledge broker service) and higher uptake of passive KT (for example, website resources) than interactive KT strategies (for example, workshops); 4) the KT function of CO-OPS was clearly valued, and appeared to address a gap in implementation. A central coordinating KT platform provided support for best practice and exchange opportunities to a broad network of practice, policy and academic professionals. Simple KT strategies such as tailored, targeted online resources were useful for practice, whilst more intensive KT strategies were important for network engagement. Findings are applicable to other information-sharing networks where professionals address complex public health problems.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 121
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Supporting Knowledge Translation Through Evaluation: Evaluator as Knowledge Broker
    Donnelly, Catherine
    Letts, Lori
    Klinger, Don
    Shulha, Lyn
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION, 2014, 29 (01) : 36 - 61
  • [22] Programme theory development and formative evaluation of a provincial knowledge translation unit
    Denise Thomson
    Stephanie Brooks
    Megan Nuspl
    Lisa Hartling
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 17
  • [23] Programme theory development and formative evaluation of a provincial knowledge translation unit
    Thomson, Denise
    Brooks, Stephanie
    Nuspl, Megan
    Hartling, Lisa
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [24] A multi-faceted knowledge translation approach to support persons with stroke and cognitive impairment: evaluation protocol
    Sara E McEwen
    Michelle Donald
    Deirdre Dawson
    Mary Y Egan
    Anne Hunt
    Sylvia Quant
    Sharron Runions
    Elizabeth Linkewich
    Implementation Science, 10
  • [25] Four year evaluation of a parent advisory group to support a research program for knowledge translation in child health
    Hartling L.
    Elliott S.A.
    Mabbott A.
    Leung J.
    Shearer K.
    Smith C.
    Scott S.D.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [26] A multi-faceted knowledge translation approach to support persons with stroke and cognitive impairment: evaluation protocol
    McEwen, Sara E.
    Donald, Michelle
    Dawson, Deirdre
    Egan, Mary Y.
    Hunt, Anne
    Quant, Sylvia
    Runions, Sharron
    Linkewich, Elizabeth
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [27] The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Waters, Elizabeth
    Roberts, Helen
    Oliver, Sandy
    Popay, Jennie
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 28 (04) : 384 - 389
  • [28] Are we there yet? Evaluation and the Knowledge Translation Journey
    Danseco, Evangeline
    Sundar, Purnima
    Kasprzak, Susan
    Witteveen, Tanya
    Woltman, Heather
    Manion, Ian
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 18 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [29] Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems
    Edwards, Amanda
    Zweigenthal, Virginia
    Olivier, Jill
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [30] Knowledge exchange and knowledge translation in physical therapy and manual therapy fields: barriers, facilitators and issues
    Funabashi, Martha
    Warren, Sharon
    Kawchuk, Gregory
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2012, 17 (04) : 227 - 233