Evaluation outcomes of a knowledge translation platform: a structure for support and exchange in prevention

被引:6
|
作者
Pettman, Tahna Lee [1 ]
Armstrong, Rebecca [1 ]
Johnson, Shae [1 ]
Love, Penelope [2 ]
Gill, Timothy [3 ]
Coveney, John [4 ]
Swinburn, Boyd [5 ]
Allender, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2020年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
knowledge translation; evidence-informed practice; exchange; networks; OBESITY PREVENTION; AUSTRALIA; PROGRESS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1332/174426418X15260526569269
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Obesity prevention is an urgent public health priority that requires action at multiple levels. Collaboration between academics, policy and practice is necessary to ensure best-practice implementation. A national knowledge translation and exchange (KT) platform, the Collaboration of Community-based Obesity Prevention Sites (CO-OPS), was delivered and evaluated over three years (2013-15). A mixed-methods evaluation used communications and website data, knowledge-brokering data, event evaluations, interviews and tracer searches to assess process (reach, delivery, quality, cost, uptake) and impact (use of tools/resources, networking, improvements in practice). Results included: 1) average 27% yearly membership growth (330 new members per year) in response to KT activities including tailored communications, stakeholder engagement, knowledge brokering and networking opportunities; 2) sustained website use with approximately 1200 visits/month and 73% unique visitors; and high access to networking and professional development information (120 hits/month), and best practice guidelines (60 hits/month); 3) higher uptake of face-to-face interactive strategies (for example, workshops) than online interactive strategies (for example, knowledge broker service) and higher uptake of passive KT (for example, website resources) than interactive KT strategies (for example, workshops); 4) the KT function of CO-OPS was clearly valued, and appeared to address a gap in implementation. A central coordinating KT platform provided support for best practice and exchange opportunities to a broad network of practice, policy and academic professionals. Simple KT strategies such as tailored, targeted online resources were useful for practice, whilst more intensive KT strategies were important for network engagement. Findings are applicable to other information-sharing networks where professionals address complex public health problems.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 121
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a knowledge translation and exchange platform to advance non-communicable disease prevention
    Pettman, Tahna Lee
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Waters, Elizabeth
    Allender, Steven
    Love, Penelope
    Gill, Tim
    Coveney, John
    Boylan, Sinead
    Booth, Sue
    Bolton, Kristy
    Swinburn, Boyd
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2016, 12 (01): : 109 - 126
  • [2] Evaluation of partnerships in a transnational family violence prevention network using an integrated knowledge translation and exchange model: a mixed methods study
    Kothari, Anita
    Sibbald, Shannon L.
    Wathen, C. Nadine
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2014, 12
  • [3] Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy
    Berman, Joshua
    Mitambo, Collins
    Matanje-Mwagomba, Beatrice
    Khan, Shiraz
    Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo
    Wroe, Emily
    Mwape, Lonia
    van Oosterhout, Joep J.
    Chindebvu, Getrude
    van Schoor, Vanessa
    Ritchie, Lisa M. Puchalski
    Panisset, Ulysses
    Kathyola, Damson
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 13
  • [4] Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy
    Joshua Berman
    Collins Mitambo
    Beatrice Matanje-Mwagomba
    Shiraz Khan
    Chiyembekezo Kachimanga
    Emily Wroe
    Lonia Mwape
    Joep J. van Oosterhout
    Getrude Chindebvu
    Vanessa van Schoor
    Lisa M. Puchalski Ritchie
    Ulysses Panisset
    Damson Kathyola
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 13
  • [5] Advancing the evaluation of integrated knowledge translation
    Kreindler, Sara A.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [6] Outcomes-focused knowledge translation: A framework for knowledge translation and patient outcomes improvement
    Doran, Diane M.
    Sidani, Souraya
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2007, 4 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [7] Evaluation of partnerships in a transnational family violence prevention network using an integrated knowledge translation and exchange model: a mixed methods study
    Anita Kothari
    Shannon L Sibbald
    C Nadine Wathen
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 12
  • [8] Can knowledge exchange support the implementation of a health-promoting schools approach? Perceived outcomes of knowledge exchange in the COMPASS study
    Kristin M. Brown
    Susan J. Elliott
    Jennifer Robertson-Wilson
    Michelle M. Vine
    Scott T. Leatherdale
    BMC Public Health, 18
  • [9] Partnerships for Knowledge Translation and Exchange in the Context of Continuing Professional Development
    Legare, France
    Borduas, Francine
    Macleod, Tanya
    Sketris, Ingrid
    Campbell, Barbara
    Jacques, Andre
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2011, 31 (03) : 181 - 187
  • [10] Can knowledge exchange support the implementation of a health-promoting schools approach? Perceived outcomes of knowledge exchange in the COMPASS study
    Brown, Kristin M.
    Elliott, Susan J.
    Robertson-Wilson, Jennifer
    Vine, Michelle M.
    Leatherdale, Scott T.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18