The efficacy of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in endoscopic ultrasonography: A comparative study

被引:2
作者
Jumle, Apurva [1 ]
Mahajan, Vaibhav [1 ]
Phalgune, Deepak [2 ]
Ghongate, Ganesh [1 ]
Dubale, Nachiket [3 ]
机构
[1] Poona Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[2] Poona Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Res, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[3] Poona Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol MED, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; endoscopic ultrasound; propofol; sedation; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; ANESTHESIA; MIDAZOLAM; CLONIDINE;
D O I
10.4103/TheIAForum.TheIAForum_87_19
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent has not been studied in a procedure such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) where propofol is being used extensively to provide a deep level of sedation. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and propofol to achieve adequate sedation levels in patients undergoing EUS. Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for EUS under sedation for the diagnostic and therapeutic purpose were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty patients in Group D received dexmedetomidine while 30 Group P patients received propofol. The recovery from sedation was assessed using the modified Aldrete's score. Once the modified Aldrete's score of 10/10 was achieved, the patients' perception regarding the pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Primary outcome measures were VAS score and vital parameters, whereas secondary outcome measures were gag reflex and recovery from sedation using the modified Aldrete's score. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative variables between the groups was done using unpaired Student's t-test and Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, respectively. Results: The absence of gag reflex was significantly higher in patients who received dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine was found to have greater hemodynamic stability compared with propofol-treated patients. Dexmedetomidine achieved similar levels of sedation to propofol, although with a slower onset of sedation. Conclusions: The use of dexmedetomidine was associated with greater hemodynamic stability and absence of gag reflex.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 43
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AHO MS, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P112
[2]  
Aldrete J A, 1998, J Perianesth Nurs, V13, P148, DOI 10.1016/S1089-9472(98)80044-0
[3]   The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation [J].
Arain, SR ;
Ebert, TJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (02) :461-466
[4]   Usefulness of applying lidocaine in esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed under sedation with propofol [J].
de la Morena, Felipe ;
Santander, Cecilio ;
Esteban, Carlos ;
de Cuenca, Beatriz ;
Antonio Garcia, Juan ;
Sanchez, Javier ;
Moreno, Ricardo .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 5 (05) :231-239
[5]   PARTICIPATION OF CARDIAC PRESYNAPTIC ALPHA-2-ADRENOCEPTORS IN THE BRADYCARDIAC EFFECTS OF CLONIDINE AND ANALOGS [J].
DEJONGE, A ;
TIMMERMANS, PBMWM ;
VANZWIETEN, PA .
NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 317 (01) :8-12
[6]  
DESARRO GB, 1987, BRIT J PHARMACOL, V90, P675
[7]   The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans [J].
Ebert, TJ ;
Hall, JE ;
Barney, JA ;
Uhrich, TD ;
Colinco, MD .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (02) :382-394
[8]   SYMPATHETIC RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN HUMANS WITH PROPOFOL OR ETOMIDATE [J].
EBERT, TJ ;
MUZI, M ;
BERENS, R ;
GOFF, D ;
KAMPINE, JP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (05) :725-733
[9]   Adverse outcomes of ERCP [J].
Freeman, ML .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (06) :S273-S282
[10]   CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR GASTROSCOPY - PATIENT TOLERANCE AND CARDIORESPIRATORY PARAMETERS [J].
FROEHLICH, F ;
SCHWIZER, W ;
THORENS, J ;
KOHLER, M ;
GONVERS, JJ ;
FRIED, M .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :697-704