Individual predictors of tactical planning performance in junior military officers

被引:1
作者
Calleja, Joseph A. [1 ]
Hoggan, Benjamin L. [2 ]
Temby, Philip [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Land Div, Def Sci & Technol, Edinburgh, SA, Australia
关键词
Military planning; tactical planning; individual differences; think-aloud protocol; training; DECISION-MAKING STYLE; GENERAL MENTAL-ABILITY; JOB-PERFORMANCE; PERSONALITY; OVERCONFIDENCE; OCCUPATIONS; EXPERTISE; SELECTION; VALIDITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/08995605.2019.1691405
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This exploratory study examined the influence of personal and psycholinguistic factors on tactical planning performance in a convenience sample of Australian Army personnel. Sixty male junior officers undertaking a tactical training course completed self-report measures of decision-making style, problem-solving appraisal, personality, and tactical planning expertise. A measure of general cognitive ability was sourced from participants' military records. During the course, officers completed several tactical planning exercises that were assessed by course instructors, and an overall measure of tactical planning performance was derived. Psycholinguistic data was derived from participants' thought processes elicited during an analogous planning exercise using a written think-aloud protocol. Automatic linear modeling analyses identified the combination of greater expertise and intuitive decision-making style, less spontaneous decision-making style and problem-solving confidence, younger age, and greater use of words relating to risk and past-focused concepts in their thought records, as significant predictors of better tactical planning, accounting for 55% of the variance in performance. Additionally, general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and rational decision-making style shared moderate positive bivariate correlations with planning performance. This research has identified individual factors that contribute to tactical mission planning, along with future research avenues, which may inform the training of military commanders at the tactical level.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 163
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1949, Personnel Selection: Test and measurement techniques"
[3]  
Australian Army, 2018, LAND WARF DOCTR 5 0
[4]  
Australian Army, 2015, LAND WARF PROC GEN 7
[5]   Development and Evaluation of an Intuitive Operational Planning Process [J].
Bryant, David J. ;
Martin, Lora Bruyn ;
Bandali, Farahnaz ;
Rehak, Lisa ;
Vokac, Robert ;
Lamoureux, Tab .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2007, 1 (04) :434-460
[6]   AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons [J].
Burnham, Kenneth P. ;
Anderson, David R. ;
Huyvaert, Kathryn P. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2011, 65 (01) :23-35
[7]   Who chokes under pressure? The Big Five personality traits and decision-making under pressure [J].
Byrne, Kaileigh A. ;
Silasi-Mansat, Crina. D. ;
Worthy, Darrell A. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 74 :22-28
[8]  
Cohen M., 2000, Training critical thinking for the battlefield: Basis in cognitive theory and research
[9]  
Cohen M.S., 1998, MAKING DECISIONS STR, P155, DOI DOI 10.1037/10278-006
[10]   Decision Styles and Rationality: An Analysis of the Predictive Validity of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory [J].
Curseu, Petru Lucian ;
Schruijer, Sandra G. L. .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2012, 72 (06) :1053-1062