The Rare Occurrence of Reoperation After Cervical Laminoplasty A 14-Year Retrospective Review of Reoperative Rates at a Single Institution

被引:1
作者
Barkley, Ariana S. [1 ]
Eaton, Jessica [1 ]
Carroll, Kate [1 ]
Sullivan, Liam T. [2 ]
Zhang, Fangyi [1 ]
Ravanpay, Ali [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, 325 Ninth Ave,Box 359924, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Dept Neurosurg, Seattle, WA USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2021年 / 34卷 / 06期
关键词
cervical spine; cervical laminoplasty; reoperation; spondylosis; spondylotic myelopathy; spinal stenosis; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; EXPANSILE LAMINOPLASTY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; REVISION SURGERY; ANTERIOR; FUSION; POSTERIOR; LAMINECTOMY; MYELOPATHY; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001142
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To determine the rate of recurrent or adjacent-level stenosis requiring reoperation after single-door cervical laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy at our institution. Summary of Background Data: Adjacent-level stenosis requiring reoperation is a commonly evaluated condition for anterior or posterior arthrodesis, however, there are few studies that evaluate adjacent-level stenosis in the case of cervical laminoplasty. Methods: Retrospective review of adults undergoing cervical laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy between January 2005 and May 2018 at our institution. Demographics, symptom duration, stenotic levels, preoperative and postoperative Medical Research Council motor, American Spinal Injury Association, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, and Nurick grade were obtained. Postoperative data included presence of C5 palsy, infection rate, alleviation or persistence of symptoms, and rate of recurrent or adjacent-level stenosis. Results: A total of 102 patients underwent cervical laminoplasty; mean age was 56.7 years (+/- 12.96). Most were men (n=76, 74.5%), with myelopathy (n=64, 63.4%), C4 (n=94, 93.1%), and C5 (n=92, 91.1%) cervical stenosis; mean symptom duration was 55 days (7 d to 2.8 y). Average follow-up was 6.4 months (+/- 3.4). After surgery, there was statistically significant improvement in Nurick grade (3.1 +/- 2.2 vs. 2.7 +/- 2.4, P=0.002) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (11.4 +/- 3.7 vs. 13.9 +/- 3.6, P<0.001); American Spinal Injury Association scores also improved (P<0.001). Rate of postoperative C5 palsy was 7.8% (n=8); postoperative infection rate was 1.96% (n=2). Reoperation rate was 4.9% (n=5); reoperation for recurrent or adjacent-level stenosis was 1.96% (n=2). Conclusions: Recurrent or adjacent-level stenosis requiring reoperation after cervical laminoplasty is rare. Longitudinal studies are needed to verify correlation between motion preservation and incidence of adjacent or recurrent stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:E342 / E348
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Outcomes after cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion versus expansile laminoplasty: A propensity matched study of 3185 patients [J].
Adogwa, Owoicho ;
Huang, Kevin ;
Hazzard, Matthew ;
Chagoya, Gustavo ;
Owens, Ryan ;
Cheng, Joseph ;
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ;
Boakye, Maxwell ;
Lad, Shivanand P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (03) :549-553
[2]  
Agarwal A, 2020, CLIN SPINE SURG, V33, pE364, DOI 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000976
[3]   Implant Retention or Removal for Management of Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery [J].
Agarwal, Aakash ;
Kelkar, Amey ;
Aargwal, Ashish G. ;
Jayaswal, Daksh ;
Schultz, Christian ;
Jayaswal, Arvind ;
Goel, Vijay K. ;
Agarwal, Anand K. ;
Gidvani, Sandeep .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (05) :640-646
[4]   Short-term Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty and Decompression and Fusion With Instrumentation [J].
Boniello, Anthony ;
Petrucelli, Philip ;
Kerbel, Yudi ;
Horn, Samantha ;
Bortz, Cole A. ;
Brown, Avery E. ;
Pierce, Katherine E. ;
Alas, Haddy ;
Khalsa, Amrit ;
Passias, Peter .
SPINE, 2019, 44 (17) :E1018-E1023
[5]   Prevalence of Occult Infections in Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion [J].
Callanan, Tucker C. ;
Abjornson, Celeste ;
DiCarlo, Edward ;
Henry, Michael ;
Sama, Andrew A. ;
Girardi, Federico P. ;
Schroeder, Josh ;
Kiely, Paul ;
Lebl, Darren R. ;
Cammisa, Frank P., Jr. .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (01) :25-31
[6]   Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support [J].
Harris, Paul A. ;
Taylor, Robert ;
Thielke, Robert ;
Payne, Jonathon ;
Gonzalez, Nathaniel ;
Conde, Jose G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) :377-381
[7]   Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy -: An independent matched cohort analysis [J].
Heller, JG ;
Edwards, CC ;
Murakami, H ;
Rodts, GE .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (12) :1330-1336
[8]   Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion [J].
Highsmith, Jason M. ;
Dhall, Sanjay S. ;
Haid, Regis W., Jr. ;
Rodts, Gerald E., Jr. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 14 (05) :619-625
[9]   EXPANSIVE OPEN-DOOR LAMINOPLASTY FOR CERVICAL SPINAL STENOTIC MYELOPATHY [J].
HIRABAYASHI, K ;
WATANABE, K ;
WAKANO, K ;
SUZUKI, N ;
SATOMI, K ;
ISHII, Y .
SPINE, 1983, 8 (07) :693-699
[10]   Long-term results of a prospective study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J].
Hirai, Takashi ;
Yoshii, Toshitaka ;
Sakai, Kenichiro ;
Inose, Hiroyuki ;
Yamada, Tsuyoshi ;
Kato, Tsuyoshi ;
Kawabata, Shigenori ;
Arai, Yoshiyasu ;
Shinomiya, Kenichi ;
Okawa, Atsushi .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (01) :32-38