Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery

被引:140
作者
Dong, CCJ
MacDonald, DB
Akagami, R
Westerberg, B
AlKhani, A
Kanaan, I
Hassounah, M
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Sect Neurophysiol, Dept Neurosci, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Surg, Div Otolaryngol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Neurosci, Neurosurg Sect, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
关键词
transcranial electrical stimulation; motor evoked potential; intraoperative facial nerve monitoring; electromyography; skull base surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.013
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To address the limitations of standard electromyography (EMG) facial nerve monitoring techniques by exploring the novel application of multi-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation (mpTES) to myogenic facial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Methods: In 76 patients undergoing skull base surgery, mpTES was delivered through electrodes 1 cm anterior to C1 and C2 (M1-M2), C3 and C4 (M3-M4) or C3 or C4 and Cz (M3/M4-Mz), with the anode contralateral to the operative side. Facial MEPs were monitored from the orbicularis oris muscle on the operative side. Distal facial nerve excitation was excluded by the absence of single pulse responses and by onset latency consistent with a central origin. Results: M3/M4-Mz mpTES (n = 50) reliably produced facial MEPs while M1-M2 (n = 18) or M3-M4 (n = 8) stimulation produced 6 technical failures. Facial MEPs could be successfully monitored in 21 of 22 patients whose proximal facial nerves were inaccessible to direct stimulation. Using 50, 35 and 0% of baseline amplitude criteria, significant facial deficits were predicted with a sensitivity/specificity of 1.00/0.88, 0.91/0.97 and 0.64/1.00, respectively. Conclusions: Facial MEPs can provide an ongoing surgeon-independent assessment of facial nerve function and predict facial nerve outcome with sufficiently useful accuracy. Significance: This method substantially improves facial nerve monitoring during skull base surgery. (c) 2004 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 596
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
AKAGAMI R, 2003, CAN J NEUROL SCI, V30, P56
[2]  
American Electroencephalographic Society, 1994, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V11, P77
[3]  
BURKE D, 1999, RECOMMENDATIONS PRAC, P133
[4]   Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring [J].
Calancie, B ;
Harris, W ;
Broton, JG ;
Alexeeva, N ;
Green, BA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 88 (03) :457-470
[5]  
Cocito D, 1992, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V32, P521
[6]  
de Haan P, 1998, Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, V10, P19
[7]  
Deletis V, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V939, P137
[8]   Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli [J].
Deletis, V ;
Isgum, V ;
Amassian, VE .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :438-444
[9]  
DELETIS V, 1993, ELECT MAGNETIC STIMU, P201
[10]   Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery [J].
Dong, CCJ ;
MacDonald, DB ;
Janusz, MT .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 74 (05) :S1873-S1876