Prosthetic Joint Infections and Cost Analysis?

被引:42
作者
Haddad, F. S. [1 ]
Ngu, A. [1 ]
Negus, J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Euston Rd, London NW1 2BU, England
来源
MODERN APPROACH TO BIOFILM-RELATED ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT INFECTIONS: ADVANCES IN MICROBIOLOGY, INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 5 | 2017年 / 971卷
关键词
Periprosthetic infection; Septic arthroplasty; Joint infection; Cost analysis; DAIR; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; SINGLE-STAGE REVISION; FINANCIAL ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC BURDEN; DEBRIDEMENT; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT; RETENTION; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1007/5584_2016_155
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Prosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of arthroplasty surgery that can lead to debilitating morbidity for the patient and significant expense for the healthcare system. With the continual rise of arthroplasty cases worldwide every year, the revision load for infection is becoming a greater financial burden on healthcare budgets. Prevention of infection has to be the key to reducing this burden. For treatment, it is critical for us to collect quality data that can guide future management strategies to minimise healthcare costs and morbidity / mortality for patients. There has been a management shift in many countries to a less expensive 1-stage strategy and in selective cases to the use of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention. These appear very attractive options on many levels, not least cost. However, with a consensus on the definition of joint infection only clarified in 2011, there is still the need for high quality cost analysis data to be collected on how the use of these different methods could impact the healthcare expenditure of countries around the world. With a projected spend on revision for infection at US $1.62 billion in the US alone, this data is vital and urgently needed.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Australian Orthopaedic Association, 2015, NAT JOINT REPL REG N
[2]   Treatment of joint prosthesis infection in accordance with current recommendations improves outcome [J].
Betsch, Belinda Y. ;
Eggli, Stefan ;
Siebenrock, Klaus A. ;
Taeuber, Martin G. ;
Muehlemann, Kathrin .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 (08) :1221-1226
[3]   The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization [J].
Bozic, KJ ;
Ries, MD .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (08) :1746-1751
[4]   One hundred and twelve infected arthroplasties treated with 'DAIR' (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention): antibiotic duration and outcome [J].
Byren, I. ;
Bejon, P. ;
Atkins, B. L. ;
Angus, B. ;
Masters, S. ;
McLardy-Smith, P. ;
Gundle, R. ;
Berendt, A. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 63 (06) :1264-1271
[5]   CLEAN-AIR OPERATING ENCLOSURE [J].
CHARNLEY, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1964, 51 (03) :202-&
[6]   Comparison of One-Stage Revision With Antibiotic Cement Versus Two-Stage Revision Results for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Choi, Ho-Rim ;
Kwon, Young-Min ;
Freiberg, Andrew A. ;
Malchau, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (08) :66-70
[7]   Can Implant Retention be Recommended for Treatment of Infected TKA? [J].
Choi, Ho-Rim ;
von Knoch, Fabian ;
Zurakowski, David ;
Nelson, Sandra B. ;
Malchau, Henrik .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (04) :961-969
[8]   Treatment of infection with debridement and retention of the components following hip arthroplasty [J].
Crockarell, JR ;
Hanssen, AD ;
Osmon, DR ;
Morrey, BF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (09) :1306-1313
[9]  
ELSON RA, 1993, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V24, P761
[10]   Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 2 management strategies for infected total hip arthroplasty in the elderly [J].
Fisman, DN ;
Reilly, DT ;
Karchmer, AW ;
Goldie, SJ .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 32 (03) :419-430