A latent class analysis of cognitive decline in US adults, BRFSS 2015-2020

被引:2
作者
Snead, Ryan [1 ]
Dumenci, Levent [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Resa M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Latent Class Analysis; Dementia; Alzheimer's; BRFSS; Aging; Subjective Cognitive Decline; Complex Sampling; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; DEMENTIA; STIGMA; COMMUNITY; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-022-14001-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Cognitive decline can be an early indicator for dementia. Using quantitative methods and national representative survey data, we can monitor the potential burden of disease at the population-level. Methods BRFSS is an annual, nationally representative questionnaire in the United States. The optional cognitive decline module is a six-item self-reported scale pertaining to challenges in daily life due to memory loss and growing confusion over the past twelve months. Respondents are 45+, pooled from 2015-2020. Latent class analysis was used to determine unobserved subgroups of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) based on item response patterns. Multinomial logistic regression predicted latent class membership from socio-demographic covariates. Results A total of 54,771 reported experiencing SCD. The optimal number of latent classes was three, labeled as Mild, Moderate, and Severe SCD. Thirty-five percent of the sample belonged to the Severe group. Members of this subgroup were significantly less likely to be older (65+ vs. 45-54 OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.23-0.35) and more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.53-2.11), have not graduated high school (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.34-1.91), or earned <$15K a year (OR = 3.03, 95% CI: 2.43-3.77). Conclusions This study determined three latent subgroups indicating severity of SCD and identified socio-demographic predictors. Using a single categorical indicator of SCD severity instead of six separate items improves the versatility of population-level surveillance.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System overview: BRFSS 2018
[3]  
[Anonymous], DESIGN CHARACTERISTI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, [No title captured], P12
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SELF REPORTED INCREA
[7]  
Asparouhov T., 2012, MPLUS WEB NOTES
[8]   Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (03) :329-341
[9]   Dementia: stigma and its effects [J].
Benbow, Susan Mary ;
Jolley, David .
NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 2 (02) :165-172
[10]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019, COMPL SAMPL WEIGHTS