LEAP simulated economic evaluation of sustainable scenarios to fulfill the regional electricity demand in Pakistan

被引:33
作者
Shahid, Muhammad [1 ]
Ullah, Kafait [1 ]
Imran, Kashif [1 ]
Mahmood, Arshad [2 ]
Arentsen, Maarten [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, US Pakistan Ctr Adv Studies Energy USPCASE, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
[2] Govt Pakistan, Minist Planning Dev & Reforms, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci BMS, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Economic evaluation; supply-demand planning; Penetration of renewable energy; Externality cost; LEAP for Pakistan; LOW-CARBON DEVELOPMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; MODEL APPLICATION; GENERATION; SYSTEM; POLICY; FORECAST; FUTURE; POWER; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2021.101292
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Some planning problems in the power sector of Pakistan have generated several issues ranging from gradual reliance on thermal-based expensive energy mix, supply shortages, subsidization, inefficiencies at different levels of the value chain, and resultantly, the circular debt. This situation in the power sector has also hampered the growth of allied economic sectors. This study uses the Long-range Energy Alternative Planning (LEAP) system for simulating Pakistan's electrical system from 2016 to 2040. It has forecasted the electricity demand at the provincial level. At the supply side, five scenarios Business as Usual Scenario (BAUS), Coal Scenario (CS), Gas Scenario (GS), Nuclear Scenario (NS), and Renewable Scenario (RS) have been analysed based on the technoeconomic and environmental parameters. The study has also included environmental externality costs for evaluating the actual costs and benefits of different scenarios. Contrary to the expectations, RS has a lower generation than even BAUS. The study has concluded that the generation from RS has five times lesser costs than BAUS, CS, and GS. NS can also be an alternative for the sustainable future of Pakistan. Generation from imported coal is not a good option, however, indigenous coal with clean coal technologies should be promoted. This paper proposes energy planners of the country to devise incentives for the utilization of indigenous energy resources including renewables on priority and then clean coal to reduce the energy crises of Pakistan.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 99 条
[71]  
PPIB, 2015, PPIB ANN REP 2014 20
[72]   Transition pathways optimization methodology through EnergyPLAN software for long-term energy planning [J].
Prina, Matteo Giacomo ;
Lionetti, Matteo ;
Manzolini, Giampaolo ;
Sparber, Wolfram ;
Moser, David .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 235 :356-368
[73]  
Prokofieva I., 2011, Monetary Values of Environmental and Social Externalities for Cost-Benefit Analysis in the EFORWOOD Project
[74]  
PTI Energy From Crises to Solutions, 2012, PAK TEHR INS PAK
[75]  
Rana S., CENSUS 2017 FAMILY S
[76]   Energy-environment-economy nexus in Pakistan: Lessons from a PAK-TIMES model [J].
Rehman, Syed Aziz Ur ;
Cai, Yanpeng ;
Mirjat, Nayyar Hussain ;
Das Walasai, Gordhan ;
Nafees, Mohammad .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 126 :200-211
[77]   An Integrated Modeling Approach for Forecasting Long-Term Energy Demand in Pakistan [J].
Rehman, Syed Aziz Ur ;
Cai, Yanpeng ;
Fazal, Rizwan ;
Walasai, Gordhan Das ;
Mirjat, Nayyar Hussain .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (11)
[78]   Modeling the Greek energy system: Scenarios of clean energy use and their implications [J].
Roinioti, Argiro ;
Koroneos, Christopher ;
Wangensteen, Ivar .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 50 :711-722
[79]   Sustainable electricity generation mix for Iran: A fuzzy analytic network process approach [J].
Sadeghi, Arash ;
Larimian, Taimaz .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2018, 28 :30-42
[80]   Energy transition roadmap towards 100% renewable energy and role of storage technologies for Pakistan by 2050 [J].
Sadiqa, Ayesha ;
Gulagi, Ashish ;
Breyer, Christian .
ENERGY, 2018, 147 :518-533