Effectiveness of clinical decision support to enhance delivery of family planning services in primary care settings

被引:7
作者
Srinivasulu, Silpa [1 ]
Shah, Seema D. [1 ]
Schechter, Clyde B. [2 ]
Prine, Linda [1 ,3 ]
Rubin, Susan E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Family Hlth, 2006 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10035 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Family & Social Med, 1300 Morris Pk Ave, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[3] Reprod Hlth Access Project, POB 21191, New York, NY 10025 USA
关键词
Clinical decision support; Family medicine; Family planning services; Federally qualified health center; Primary care; Screening; WOMEN; RECOMMENDATIONS; PREGNANCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2019.11.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: There is a need to improve delivery of family planning services, including preconception and contraception services, in primary care. We assessed whether a clinician-facing clinical decision support implemented in a family medicine staffed primary care network improved provision of family planning services for reproductive-aged female patients, and differed in effect for certain patients or clinical settings. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic study with difference-in-differences design to estimate, at the visit-level, the clinical decision support's effect on documenting the provision of family planning services 52 weeks prior to and after implementation. We also used logistic regression with a sample subset to evaluate intervention effect on the patient-level. Results: 27,817 eligible patients made 91,185 visits during the study period. Overall, unadjusted documentation of family planning services increased by 2.7 percentage points (55.7% pre-intervention to 58.4% intervention). In the adjusted analysis, documentation increased by 3.4 percentage points (95% CI: 2.24, 4.63). The intervention effect varied across sites at the visit-level, ranging from a -1.2 to +6.5 percentage point change. Modification of effect by race, insurance, and site were substantial, but not by age group nor ethnicity. Additionally, patient-level subset analysis showed that those exposed to the intervention had 1.26 times the odds of having family planning services documented after implementation compared to controls (95% CI: 1.17, 1.36). Conclusions: This clinical decision support modestly improved documentation of family planning services in our primary care network; effect varied across sites. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 204
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Rethinking the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm: Unintended Conceptions or Unrepresentative Concepts? [J].
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Borrero, Sonya ;
Callegari, Lisa S. ;
Dehlendorf, Christine .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 48 (03) :147-151
[2]   A blessing I can't afford: Factors underlying the paradox of happiness about unintended pregnancy [J].
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Dillaway, Chloe ;
Mevs-Korff, Natasha .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 132 :149-155
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NCHS DATA BRIEF
[4]  
Baldwin MK, 2018, CONTRACEPT REPROD ME, V3
[5]   Perceptions of a reproductive health self-assessment tool (RH-SAT) in an urban community health center [J].
Bello, Jennifer K. ;
Adkins, Katlynn ;
Stulberg, Debra B. ;
Rao, Goutham .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 93 (03) :655-663
[6]   Reproductive Life Plan Counseling and Effective Contraceptive Use among Urban Women Utilizing Title X Services [J].
Bommaraju, Aalap ;
Malat, Jennifer ;
Mooney, Jennifer L. .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2015, 25 (03) :209-215
[7]   Reproductive Life Planning in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Women Veterans' Perceptions [J].
Callegari, Lisa S. ;
Borrero, Sonya ;
Reiber, Gayle E. ;
Nelson, Karin M. ;
Zephyrin, Laurie ;
Sayre, George G. ;
Katon, Jodie G. .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2015, 25 (05) :548-554
[8]   "I Just Don't Know": An Exploration of Women's Ambivalence about a New Pregnancy [J].
Cutler, Abigail ;
McNamara, Blair ;
Qasba, Neena ;
Kennedy, Holly Powell ;
Lundsberg, Lisbet ;
Gariepy, Aileen .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2018, 28 (01) :75-81
[9]  
Daniels K., 2018, Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-49: United States, 2015-2017
[10]  
Farahi N, 2013, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V88, P499