Outage costs quantification for benefit-cost analysis of distribution automation systems

被引:19
作者
Su, Chun-Lien [1 ]
Teng, Jen-Ho [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Kaohsiung Marine Univ, Dept Marine Engn, Kaohsiung 805, Taiwan
[2] I Shou Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Kaohsiung 840, Taiwan
关键词
distribution automation; outage cost; benefit-cost analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.06.026
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Deregulation of electric power industry has motivated electricity customers to pay more attention in evaluating both the direct cost of electric service and the monetary value of reliable electric service. This movement has been recognized by the utilities and the value-based aspects are introduced into the planning and design of power systems to consider the outage costs. The value of service reliability that can portray and respond to actual utility and customer impacts as a result of power interruptions plays a major role on justifying whether a distribution automation (DA) system is beneficial or not. However, for the value of service reliability, there are a number of factors that can affect it. To exactly evaluate the service reliability value, two formulas for quantifying the customer interruption costs and utility reduced energy revenues associated with power failures are derived in this paper. The customer types, feeder loads, feeder failure rate, number of switch, restoration time, and repair time are taken into account. The proposed formulas can provide an exact estimate in outages costs of a feeder and their computation is simplified and straightforward. The estimated outage costs can then be used to calculate the reliability improvement benefit of DA systems for the system benefit-cost analysis. A practical DA system implemented by Taiwan Power Company is used to illustrate the proposed formulas and the benefit-cost analysis result is presented. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to reduce the effects of benefit-cost analysis parameters on the analysis result. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 774
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Toward Standardization of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Early Childhood Interventions [J].
Karoly, Lynn A. .
JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2012, 3 (01)
[32]   Willingness to pay and benefit-cost analysis of modern contraceptives in Nigeria [J].
Onwujekwe, Obinna ;
Ogbonna, Chinwe ;
Ibe, Ogochukwu ;
Uzochukwu, Benjamin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 122 (02) :94-98
[33]   Benefit-Cost Analysis of Contributions of Garbage Pickers in Beijing City [J].
Zhou, Yan-Fang ;
Xiong, Hui-Bo ;
Chen, Qiao .
EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, :3546-+
[34]   Benefit-cost analysis of a low-impact development design [J].
Hidayah, Entin ;
Widiarti, W. Y. ;
Wiyono, R. U. A. ;
Dermawan, V. ;
Fadhilah, D. ;
Tahir, W. .
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (02) :502-518
[35]   Accounting for systematic risk in benefit-cost analysis: a practical approach [J].
Hansen, Jason ;
Lipow, Jonathan .
JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2013, 4 (03) :361-373
[36]   Benefit-cost analysis of watershed conservation on Hawai'i Island [J].
Burnett, Kimberly ;
Wada, Christopher ;
Balderston, Adele .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 131 :262-274
[37]   Evaluating the Talent Search TRIO program: A Benefit-Cost Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis [J].
Bowden, A. Brooks ;
Belfield, Clive .
JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2015, 6 (03) :572-602
[38]   Benefit-cost analysis of non-marginal climate and energy projects [J].
Dietz, Simon ;
Hepburn, Cameron .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 :61-71
[39]   Benefit-Cost Analysis: Distributional Considerations under Producer Quota Buyouts [J].
Schmitz, Andrew ;
Schmitz, Troy G. .
JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2010, 1 (01)
[40]   Benefit-Cost Analysis of Radiocesium Decorporation by a Prussian Blue Treatment and Stockpiling [J].
Rump, Alexis ;
Stricklin, Daniela ;
Lamkowski, Andreas ;
Eder, Stefan ;
Port, Matthias .
DRUG RESEARCH, 2018, 68 (02) :89-99