From sensory to social: the information that impacts animal foraging decisions

被引:3
作者
Sulikowski, Danielle [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Psychol, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia
关键词
OPTIMIZATION; EVOLUTION; CHOICE; HUMMINGBIRDS; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM; STRATEGY; BEHAVIOR; PREY; WILD;
D O I
10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.04.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Foraging decisions reflect cost-benefit trade-offs. Costs arise from missed opportunities, ingestion (such as if prey are toxic), and acquisition (time and energy through exploration). Benefits arise from acquiring energy, nutrients and information. I present a collection of recent findings from vertebrates and invertebrates, demonstrating the breadth of information sensory, social, nutritional, spatial and physiological, to name a few- that impacts animal foraging decisions. I also consider key challenges facing the study of foraging cognition, namely misgivings arising from observations of suboptimal foraging decisions in laboratory studies, and a lack of transferability between information use in the laboratory and that in the world. I conclude that an emphasis on custom experimental designs is key to continued empirical progress in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 99
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Individual differences in foraging decisions: information-gathering strategies or flexibility? [J].
Arvidsson, Lisa K. ;
Matthysen, Erik .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 27 (05) :1353-1361
[2]   The use of numerical information by bees in foraging tasks [J].
Bar-Shai, Noam ;
Keasar, Tamar ;
Shmida, Avi .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 22 (02) :317-325
[3]   Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive [J].
Barnett, Craig A. ;
Bateson, Melissa ;
Rowe, Candy .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 10 (11)
[4]   Decision-making and action selection in insects: inspiration from vertebrate-based theories [J].
Barron, Andrew B. ;
Gurney, Kevin N. ;
Meah, Lianne F. S. ;
Vasilaki, Eleni ;
Marshall, James A. R. .
FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
[5]   The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Brown, Eric ;
Moehlis, Jeff ;
Holmes, Philip ;
Cohen, Jonathan D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (04) :700-765
[6]   The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation [J].
Brown, Scott D. ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (03) :153-178
[7]   RISK-SENSITIVITY - AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE AFFECTS FORAGING CHOICE [J].
CARACO, T ;
BLANCKENHORN, WU ;
GREGORY, GM ;
NEWMAN, JA ;
RECER, GM ;
ZWICKER, SM .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1990, 39 :338-345
[8]   Avian predators change their foraging strategy on defended prey when undefended prey are hard to find [J].
Carle, Thomas ;
Rowe, Candy .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2014, 93 :97-103
[9]   Personality predicts decision making only when information is unreliable [J].
Carter, Alecia J. ;
Marshall, Harry H. ;
Heinsohn, Robert ;
Cowlishaw, Guy .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 86 (03) :633-639
[10]   Preys' exploitation of predators' fear: when the caterpillar plays the Gruffalo [J].
Castellano, Sergio ;
Cermelli, Paolo .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 282 (1820)