Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths

被引:136
作者
Macdonald, Kelly [1 ]
Germine, Laura [2 ]
Anderson, Alida [3 ]
Christodoulou, Joanna [4 ]
McGrath, Lauren M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, McLean Hosp, Belmont, MA USA
[3] Amer Univ, Sch Educ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[4] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Commun Sci & Disorders, Charlestown, MA USA
[5] Univ Denver, Dept Psychol, Denver, CO 80208 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
neuromyths; educational neuroscience; learning styles; dyslexia; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; TEACHERS; DYSLEXIA; BRAIN; KNOWLEDGE; CHILDREN; SUPPLEMENTATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Neuromyths are misconceptions about brain research and its application to education and learning. Previous research has shown that these myths may be quite pervasive among educators, but less is known about how these rates compare to the general public or to individuals who have more exposure to neuroscience. This study is the first to use a large sample from the United States to compare the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among educators, the general public, and individuals with high neuroscience exposure. Neuromyth survey responses and demographics were gathered via an online survey hosted at TestMyBrain. org. We compared performance among the three groups of interest: educators (N = 598), high neuroscience exposure (N = 234), and the general public (N = 3,045) and analyzed predictors of individual differences in neuromyths performance. In an exploratory factor analysis, we found that a core group of 7 "classic" neuromyths factored together (items related to learning styles, dyslexia, the Mozart effect, the impact of sugar on attention, right-brain/left-brain learners, and using 10% of the brain). The general public endorsed the greatest number of neuromyths (M = 68%), with significantly fewer endorsed by educators (M = 56%), and still fewer endorsed by the high neuroscience exposure group (M = 46%). The two most commonly endorsed neuromyths across all groups were related to learning styles and dyslexia. More accurate performance on neuromyths was predicted by age (being younger), education (having a graduate degree), exposure to neuroscience courses, and exposure to peer-reviewed science. These findings suggest that training in education and neuroscience can help reduce but does not eliminate belief in neuromyths. We discuss the possible underlying roots of the most prevalent neuromyths and implications for classroom practice. These empirical results can be useful for developing comprehensive training modules for educators that target general misconceptions about the brain and learning.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]   ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON INSTRUCTION [J].
ROSENSHINE, B .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 88 (05) :262-268
[52]   Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut Longitudinal Study at Adolescence [J].
Shaywitz, SE ;
Fletcher, JM ;
Holahan, JM ;
Shneider, AE ;
Marchione, KE ;
Stuebing, KK ;
Francis, DJ ;
Pugh, KR ;
Shaywitz, BA .
PEDIATRICS, 1999, 104 (06) :1351-1359
[53]   Neuroscience and education: prime time to build the bridge [J].
Sigman, Mariano ;
Pena, Marcela ;
Goldin, Andrea P. ;
Ribeiro, Sidarta .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 17 (04) :497-502
[54]  
Simmonds A., 2014, How neuroscience is affecting education: Report of teacher and parent surveys
[55]   Causal models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: From common simple deficits to multiple developmental pathways [J].
Sonuga-Barke, EJS .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 57 (11) :1231-1238
[56]   Statistical Learning, Letter Reversals, and Reading [J].
Treiman, Rebecca ;
Gordon, Jessica ;
Boada, Richard ;
Peterson, Robin L. ;
Pennington, Bruce F. .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2014, 18 (06) :383-394
[57]   Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? [J].
Vellutino, FR ;
Fletcher, JM ;
Snowling, MJ ;
Scanlon, DM .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 45 (01) :2-40
[58]   What Do Preservice Teachers from the USA and the UK Know about Dyslexia? [J].
Washburn, Erin K. ;
Binks-Cantrell, Emily S. ;
Joshi, R. Malatesha .
DYSLEXIA, 2014, 20 (01) :1-18
[59]  
Weale S., 2017, TEACHERS MUST DITCH
[60]  
Weisberg DS, 2008, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V20, P470, DOI 10.1162/jocn.2008.20040