Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite

被引:56
作者
Basaran, Emine Goncu [1 ]
Ayna, Emrah [1 ]
Vallittu, Pekka K. [2 ]
Lassila, Lippo V. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dicle Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[2] Turku Univ, Inst Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent & Biomat Sci, Turku, Finland
关键词
Experimental composite; fixed dental prostheses; load-bearing capacity; FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE; RESIN-BASED COMPOSITES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PARTIAL DENTURES; PERMANENT TEETH; RESTORATIONS; STRENGTH; CONVERSION; WATER; PARTICLES;
D O I
10.3109/00016357.2010.545034
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-fabricated fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) composed of a particulate filler composite. Material and methods. Handmade FDPs were made of restorative composite (Z 100) and CAD-CAM-fabricated FDPs were made of commercial CAD-CAM blocks (VITA Temp) and two experimental CAD-CAM blocks of particulate filler composite. Experimental CAD composite A was prepared by mixing 31.2 wt.% of dimethacrylate resin with 68.7 wt.% of filler particles of barium oxide silicate (BaSiO2). Experimental CAD composite B was prepared by mixing 25.6 wt.% of dimethacrylate resin with 74.3 wt.% of filler particles of BaSiO2. Six groups were fabricated (n = 6 in each); FDPs were statically loaded until final fracture. Results. Experimental CAD composites A and B revealed the highest load-bearing capacity of the FDPs, while Z 100 showed the lowest. Conclusion. FDPs made of experimental CAD composite blocks showed higher load-bearing capacities than handmade commercial composites and commercial blocks.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 150
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], T ACAD DENT MAT
[2]  
ASMUSSEN E, 1982, SCAND J DENT RES, V90, P484
[3]  
Bagis B, 2009, J CAN DENT ASSOC, V75, P133
[4]  
Baltzer A, 2007, Int J Comput Dent, V10, P99
[5]   Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites [J].
Beun, Sebastien ;
Glorieux, Therese ;
Devaux, Jacques ;
Vreven, Jose ;
Leloup, Gaetane .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (01) :51-59
[6]   Influence of radiant exposure on contraction stress, degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites [J].
Calheiros, Fernanda C. ;
Kawano, Yoshio ;
Stansbury, Jeffrey W. ;
Braga, Roberto R. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (09) :799-803
[7]  
CARREIRO ADP, 2004, J ORAL REHABIL, V31, P1085
[8]  
CRAIG RG, 2002, RESTORATIVE DENT MAT, P237
[9]   Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite [J].
Curtis, A. R. ;
Shortall, A. C. ;
Marquis, P. M. ;
Palin, W. M. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2008, 36 (03) :186-193
[10]   The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: The impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength [J].
Curtis, Andrew R. ;
Palin, William M. ;
Fleming, Garry J. P. ;
Shortall, Adrian C. C. ;
Marquis, Peter M. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2009, 25 (02) :188-197