Program sustainability begins with the first events

被引:89
作者
Pluye, P
Potvin, L
Denis, JL
Pelletier, J
Mannoni, C
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Social Studies Med, Montreal, PQ H3A 1X1, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Adm, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Publ Hlth Directorate, Riviere Du Loup, PQ, Canada
[5] Doctors World, Paris, France
关键词
health promotion programs; implementation; institutionalization; routinization; sustainability;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.10.003
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study examines the process by which a program becomes sustainable. In health promotion, sustainability is usually modeled as the final stage of a program's evolution. In practice, however, this stage model appears deceiving. This article proposes that processes for implementing programs and for ensuring their sustainability are concomitant. Using a multiple-case study methodology, we examined routinization-the sustainability process in organizations-of the Quebec Heart Health Demonstration Project in five community health centers over 10 years. Data came from documents and interviews. The analysis considered themes using the Critical Incident Technique. Our results suggest routinization-related events occurred as soon as the project began, and the occurrence of specific routinization events foresaw the presence of program-related routines. These events were concomitant with those associated with implementation. This supports the proposition. It suggests health promoters should consider program sustainability from the very beginning, and can take inspiration from the events presented herein when looking for ways to influence the sustainability of their programs. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 137
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ABBOTT A, 1995, LONGITUDINAL FIELD R, P204
[2]   STUDIES IN THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE [J].
ANDERSSON, BB ;
NILSSON, SG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1964, 48 (06) :398-403
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Economic et Societal Les categories de la Sociologie
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Health Promotion Practice, DOI [10.1177/152483990000100311, DOI 10.1177/152483990000100311]
[5]  
BRACHT N, 1994, HLTH ED RES, V9, P143
[6]   COMMUNITY COALITIONS FOR PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION [J].
BUTTERFOSS, FD ;
GOODMAN, RM ;
WANDERSMAN, A .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (03) :315-330
[7]   CINCH: An urban coalition for empowerment and action [J].
Butterfoss, FD ;
Morrow, AL ;
Rosenthal, J ;
Dini, E ;
Crews, RC ;
Webster, JD ;
Louis, P .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (02) :212-225
[8]  
Chell E., 1998, Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research, P51
[9]  
Cook S.D. N., 1996, Organizational Learning - Organization Science, P430
[10]  
ECN, 2017, ANAL DYNAMIC PSYCHOL