Longitudinal monitoring and prediction of long-term outcome of scar stiffness on pediatric patients

被引:3
作者
Mueller, Bettina [1 ]
Mazza, Edoardo [1 ,2 ]
Schiestl, Clemens [3 ,4 ]
Elrod, Julia [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Mech & Proc Engn, Inst Mech Syst, Leonhardstr 21, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Empa, Swiss Fed Labs Mat Sci & Technol, Ueberlandstr 129, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[3] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Burn Ctr, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Steinwiesstr 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Childrens Res Ctr CRC, Steinwiesstr 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Pediatric burns; Scar maturation; POSAS; Cutometer; Nimble; SKIN ELASTICITY METER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HYPERTROPHIC SCAR; RISK-FACTORS; IN-VIVO; BURN; RELIABILITY; MATURATION; MANAGEMENT; TIME;
D O I
10.1093/burnst/tkab028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Hypertrophic scarring after burn injury is one of the greatest unmet challenges in patients with burn injuries. A better understanding of the characteristics of scar maturation and early prediction of the long-term outcome of scarring are prerequisites for improving targeted therapies and pivotal for patient counselling. Methods: Repeated measurements of scar stiffness in 11 pediatric patients were performed over the course of 1 year using 2 suction devices, the Cutometer and the Nimble. In addition, the observer pliability score of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was applied. This longitudinal study allowed quantification of the ability of each of the measured parameters to reflect scar maturation, as indicated by change in skin pliability/stiffness, over time (using linear regression); the ability to distinguish individual patients (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)); the correlation of the devices (Spearman correlation coefficient); and the ability to predict long-term scar maturation based on early scar assessment (using receiver operating characteristic). Results: All the tools used showed significant longitudinal decrease of scar stiffness from 3 months until 12 months after the injury. The Nimble (ICCpatientNimble = 0.99) and the Cutometer (ICCpatientCuto = 0.97) demonstrated an excellent ability to distinguish between individual patients. The Nimble seemed to be able to predict the 12-month pliability of scars based on early (3-month) measurements (area under the curve (AUC)(12m)(POSAS) =0.67; AUC(12m)(C) = 0.46; AUC(12m)(N) =0.79). Conclusions: The results of this preliminary study suggest that all 3 tools provide suitable means to quantify alterations in scar stiffness over time. Initial evidence suggests the Nimble is most favorable for predicting changes in stiffness associated with long-term scar maturation. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to validate tissue suction as a clinical tool for analysis of changes of scar stiffness over time.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [11] Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment
    Draaijers, LJ
    Botman, YAM
    Tempelman, FRH
    Kreis, RW
    Middelkoop, E
    van Zuijlen, PPM
    [J]. BURNS, 2004, 30 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [12] An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care
    Elrod, Julia
    Muller, Bettina
    Mohr, Christoph
    Meuli, Martin
    Mazza, Edoardo
    Schiestl, Clemens
    [J]. BURNS, 2019, 45 (05) : 1102 - 1111
  • [13] Quantification of cutaneous sclerosis with a skin elasticity meter in patients with generalized scleroderma
    Enomoto, DNH
    Mekkes, JR
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Hoekzema, R
    Bos, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 35 (03) : 381 - 387
  • [14] Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury
    Finnerty, Celeste C.
    Jeschke, Marc G.
    Branski, Ludwik K.
    Barret, Juan P.
    Dziewulski, Peter
    Herndon, David N.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 388 (10052) : 1427 - 1436
  • [15] Fong SSL, 1997, BURNS, V23, pS12
  • [16] Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - The DermaLab Combo
    Gankande, T. U.
    Duke, J. M.
    Danielsen, P. L.
    DeJong, H. M.
    Wood, F. M.
    Wallace, H. J.
    [J]. BURNS, 2014, 40 (08) : 1521 - 1529
  • [17] Hypertrophic Scarring and Keloids: Pathomechanisms and Current and Emerging Treatment Strategies
    Gauglitz, Gerd G.
    Korting, Hans C.
    Pavicic, Tatiana
    Ruzicka, Thomas
    Jeschke, Marc G.
    [J]. MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2011, 17 (1-2) : 113 - 125
  • [18] Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity
    Goei, H.
    van der Vlies, C. H.
    Tuinebreijer, W. E.
    van Zuijlen, P. P. M.
    Middelkoop, E.
    van Baar, M. E.
    [J]. BURNS, 2017, 43 (04) : 715 - 723
  • [19] Patient reported facial scar assessment: directions for the professional
    Hoogewerf, Cornelis J.
    van Baar, Margriet E.
    Middelkoop, Esther
    van Loey, Nancy E.
    [J]. BURNS, 2014, 40 (02) : 347 - 353
  • [20] Effectiveness of Autologous Fat Grafting in Adherent Scars: Results Obtained by a Comprehensive Scar Evaluation Protocol
    Jaspers, Marielle E. H.
    Brouwer, Katrien M.
    van Trier, Antoine J. M.
    Groot, Marloes L.
    Middelkoop, Esther
    van Zuijlen, Paul P. M.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (01) : 212 - 219