Stimulation of osteogenic differentiation in human osteoprogenitor cells by pulsed electromagnetic fields: an in vitro study

被引:129
作者
Jansen, Justus H. W. [1 ]
van der Jagt, Olav P. [1 ]
Punt, Bas J. [3 ]
Verhaar, Jan A. N. [1 ]
van Leeuwen, Johannes P. T. M. [2 ]
Weinans, Harrie [1 ]
Jahr, Holger [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Albert Schweitzer Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-3300 AK Dordrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS | 2010年 / 11卷
关键词
BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINS; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; HUMAN OSTEOBLASTIC CELLS; MESSENGER-RNA EXPRESSION; EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; GENE-EXPRESSION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; FRACTURE REPAIR; STROMAL CELLS; NON-UNIONS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-11-188
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation may be clinically beneficial during fracture healing and for a wide range of bone disorders, there is still debate on its working mechanism. Mesenchymal stem cells are likely mediators facilitating the observed clinical effects of PEMF. Here, we performed in vitro experiments to investigate the effect of PEMF stimulation on human bone marrow-derived stromal cell (BMSC) metabolism and, specifically, whether PEMF can stimulate their osteogenic differentiation. Methods: BMSCs derived from four different donors were cultured in osteogenic medium, with the PEMF treated group being continuously exposed to a 15 Hz, 1 Gauss EM field, consisting of 5-millisecond bursts with 5-microsecond pulses. On culture day 1, 5, 9, and 14, cells were collected for biochemical analysis (DNA amount, alkaline phosphatase activity, calcium deposition), expression of various osteoblast-relevant genes and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling. Differences between treated and control groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and considered significant when p < 0.05. Results: Biochemical analysis revealed significant, differentiation stage-dependent, PEMF-induced differences: PEMF increased mineralization at day 9 and 14, without altering alkaline phosphatase activity. Cell proliferation, as measured by DNA amounts, was not affected by PEMF until day 14. Here, DNA content stagnated in PEMF treated group, resulting in less DNA compared to control. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that during early culture, up to day 9, PEMF treatment increased mRNA levels of bone morphogenetic protein 2, transforming growth factor-beta 1, osteoprotegerin, matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -3, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein. In contrast, receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand expression was primarily stimulated on day 14. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was not affected by PEMF stimulation. Conclusions: PEMF exposure of differentiating human BMSCs enhanced mineralization and seemed to induce differentiation at the expense of proliferation. The osteogenic stimulus of PEMF was confirmed by the up-regulation of several osteogenic marker genes in the PEMF treated group, which preceded the deposition of mineral itself. These findings indicate that PEMF can directly stimulate osteoprogenitor cells towards osteogenic differentiation. This supports the theory that PEMF treatment may recruit these cells to facilitate an osteogenic response in vivo.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Acceleration of experimental endochondral ossification by biophysical stimulation of the progenitor cell pool
    Aaron, RK
    Ciombor, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1996, 14 (04) : 582 - 589
  • [2] ACCELERATION OF FRACTURE REPAIR BY ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS - SURGICALLY NONINVASIVE METHOD
    BASSETT, CAL
    PAWLUK, RJ
    PILLA, AA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1974, 238 (OCT11) : 242 - 262
  • [3] Pulsed electromagnetic fields simultaneously induce osteogenesis and upregulate transcription of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in rat osteoblasts in vitro
    Bodamyali, T
    Bhatt, B
    Hughes, FJ
    Winrow, VR
    Kanczler, JM
    Simon, B
    Abbott, J
    Blake, DR
    Stevens, CR
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1998, 250 (02) : 458 - 461
  • [4] Transforming growth factor beta in fracture repair
    Bostrom, MPG
    Asnis, P
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1998, (355) : S124 - S131
  • [5] Signal transduction in electrically stimulated bone cells
    Brighton, CT
    Wang, W
    Seldes, R
    Zhang, GH
    Pollack, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (10) : 1514 - 1523
  • [6] Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities
    Chang, WHS
    Chen, LT
    Sun, JS
    Lin, FH
    [J]. BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2004, 25 (06) : 457 - 465
  • [7] ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SIMIAN-VIRUS 40-IMMORTALIZED OSTEOBLASTIC CELL-LINE FROM NORMAL HUMAN BONE
    CHIBA, H
    SAWADA, N
    ONO, T
    ISHII, S
    MORI, M
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1993, 84 (03): : 290 - 297
  • [8] In vitro expansion affects the response of chondrocytes to mechanical stimulation
    Das, R. H. J.
    Jahr, H.
    Verhaar, J. A. N.
    van der Linden, J. C.
    van Osch, G. J. V. M.
    Weinans, H.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2008, 16 (03) : 385 - 391
  • [9] De Mattei M, 1999, BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, V20, P177, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1999)20:3<177::AID-BEM4>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-#