A bibliometric content analysis of do-it-yourself (DIY) science: where to from here for management research?

被引:10
作者
Galvin, Peter [1 ]
Klarin, Anton [1 ]
Nyuur, Richard [2 ]
Burton, Nicholas [2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup, Australia
[2] Northumbria Univ, Fac Business & Law, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
DIY science; bibliometric content analysis; institutional science; MAKER MOVEMENT; LABORATORIES; INNOVATION; PROFESSIONALIZATION; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; FABRICATION; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEM; MEN;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2021.1959031
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Do-it-yourself (DIY) science research is currently in an expansion phase both in terms of its depth (with an increasing number of papers published each year) and its scope (with the core ideas being linked to an increasing number of constructs). To develop a more holistic appreciation of how the field has developed and to identify potential avenues of future research we undertake a bibliometric content analysis of the DIY science literature post 1980. We find four major clusters pertaining to education, culture, the operationalising of DIY science (including commercialisation) and technology-related issues. We review each of these clusters and the main themes contained within the cluster, including highlighting possible research questions that align to these key themes. We find the field to be highly dispersed theoretically on the basis of the bibliometric content analysis. In considering a range of sample papers in each thematic cluster, we identify a range of potential research topics going forward. Identifying the key thematic foci of DIY science research to date provides the researchers within the field the opportunity to clearly locate their work within a highly diverse literature and to build new research trajectories around core concepts.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1266
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Anderson Chris., 2012, MAKERS NEW IND REVOL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, Democratizing innovation
  • [3] The decline of science in corporate R&D
    Arora, Ashish
    Belenzon, Sharon
    Patacconi, Andrea
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (01) : 3 - 32
  • [4] Cultural diversity and knowledge in explaining entrepreneurship in European cities
    Audretsch, David B.
    Belitski, Maksim
    Korosteleva, Julia
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2021, 56 (02) : 593 - 611
  • [5] 'Men of science': Language, identity and professionalization in the mid-Victorian scientific community
    Barton, R
    [J]. HISTORY OF SCIENCE, 2003, 41 (131) : 73 - 119
  • [6] Internal or external spillovers-Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies
    Battke, Benedikt
    Schmidt, Tobias S.
    Stollenwerk, Stephan
    Hoffmann, Volker H.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [7] The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research
    Browder, Russell E.
    Aldrich, Howard E.
    Bradley, Steven W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2019, 34 (03) : 459 - 476
  • [8] Hands On, Hands Off: Gendered Access in Crafting and Electronics Practices
    Buchholz, Beth
    Shively, Kate
    Peppler, Kylie
    Wohlwend, Karen
    [J]. MIND CULTURE AND ACTIVITY, 2014, 21 (04) : 278 - 297
  • [9] How the effect of opportunity discovery on innovation outcome differs between DIY laboratories and public research institutes: The role of industry turbulence and knowledge generation in the case of Singapore
    Cheah, Sarah Lai-Yin
    Ho, Yuen-Ping
    Li, Shiyu
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 160
  • [10] Are artists and engineers inventing the culture of tomorrow?
    Damm, Ursula
    Hopfengaertner, Bernhard
    Niopek, Dominik
    Bayer, Philipp
    [J]. FUTURES, 2013, 48 : 55 - 64