Environmental planning crisis in urban Ghana: Local responses to nature's call

被引:7
作者
Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful [1 ]
Kosoe, Enoch Akwasi [2 ]
Diawuo, Francis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Dev Studies, Dept Environm & Resource Studies, Tamale, Ghana
关键词
Environmental sanitation; In-house; Toilet facility; Sustainable Development Goals; Urban planning; Waste management; BEHAVIORAL DETERMINANTS; ATTITUDES; CONSERVATION; CITIES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134898
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Worldwide, there is increasing acknowledgement of the dangers of improper human waste management, particularly open defecation, on the environment and human wellbeing. With about 85.7% of Ghana's population without access to decent toilet facilities as of 2017, Ghana ranks highly in the world among countries with poor human waste management practices. Focusing on urban Ghana, the purpose of this article is twofold: first, to analyze the social, economic, institutional and cultural factors inhibiting the provision of household toilet facility in urban Ghana; and second, to assess how urban residents are coping with the absence of in-house toilet facilities, and the urban planning implications. Using Wa municipality as a case study, household survey and key informant interviews were conducted. Findings indicate that provision of in-house toilet facilities is influenced by complex interactions of socio-economic (e.g. income and educational levels) and cultural (community belief system in relation to toilet provision) factors as well as distortions in the urban planning regime (e.g. limited monitoring systems, inadequate logistics and personnel). Findings from a regression analysis between residents' attitudes to provision of toilet facilities and the benefits they receive or derive from the availability and/use of in-house toilet facilities indicated a positive correlation (correlation coefficient 0.750; degrees of freedom 13; p value 0.001), yet residents have resorted to the use of communal toilet facilities, open defecation and 'perching' (i.e. sharing with friends' with in-house toilet facilities). Implications of the findings for environmental planning are discussed. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Coffey A., 2015, UNDERSTANDING EXCEPT
[22]  
EWURA, 2020, The Asbestos Worker, P1
[23]   Exploring changes in open defecation prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa based on national level indices [J].
Galan, Deise I. ;
Kim, Seung-Sup ;
Graham, Jay P. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
[24]  
Ghana Statistical Service, 2013, 2010 POPULATION HOUS
[25]  
Kosoe E. A., 2018, Ghana Journal of Development Studies, V15, P151, DOI 10.4314/gjds.v15i1.8
[26]  
Mazeau A., 2013, Waterlines, V32, P334, DOI DOI 10.3362/1756-3488.2013.034
[27]   Emerging categories of urban shared sanitation [J].
Mazeau, Adrien ;
Reed, Brian ;
Sansom, Kevin ;
Scott, Rebecca .
WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 28 (04) :592-608
[28]   Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area [J].
Mehta, JN ;
Kellert, SR .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 25 (04) :320-333
[29]  
Osumanu I. K., 2016, J. Geogr. Reg. Plann., V9, P139, DOI DOI 10.5897/JGRP2016.0557
[30]  
Osumanu I. K., 2013, Ghana Journal of Geography, V5, P17