Correspondence of gas holdup and bubble size in presence of different frothers

被引:64
作者
Azgomi, F. [1 ]
Gomez, C. O. [1 ]
Finch, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
frother; bubble size; gas holdup; bubble rise velocity; bubble swarms;
D O I
10.1016/j.minpro.2007.03.002
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Frothers can be classified (ranked) according to the gas holdup vs. concentration relationship generated when gas is sparged into a water column. One argument for using gas holdup is a correspondence with bubble size through the effect on bubble velocity: An increase in gas holdup signifies a decrease in bubble velocity associated with a decrease in size. This correspondence is examined in this communication. The method of determining bubble size is described. With MIBC as the example frother, two regions of the gas holdup vs. concentration relationship were examined: low concentration where, rather than increasing, gas holdup varies little; and high concentration where, rather than becoming constant, a steady increase in gas holdup occurs. The first was associated with bubble size not having decreased sufficiently to reduce bubble velocity. In the second case the increase is associated with a steady increase in the population of small bubbles that is not readily detected by the commonly used Sauter mean parameter. Lastly, the bubble size at equal gas holdup for a suite of frothers was examined. Rather than being the same the bubble size showed significant differences. This implies that there is a frother type (chemistry) effect, either on the velocity of the single bubble or the swarm. The evidence for such a frother effect is discussed. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AZGOMI F, 2006, 6 UBC MCGILL UA S MI, P429
[2]   RECONCILIATION OF BUBBLE-SIZE ESTIMATION METHODS USING DRIFT FLUX ANALYSIS [J].
BANISI, S ;
FINCH, JA .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (12) :1555-1559
[3]   Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability [J].
Cho, YS ;
Laskowski, JS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2002, 64 (2-3) :69-80
[4]  
Clift R., 2005, BUBBLES DROPS PARTIC
[5]  
Dukhin SS, 1998, STUD INTERF SCI, V6, P367, DOI 10.1016/S1383-7303(98)80025-2
[6]  
Finch J.A., 1990, COLUMN FLOTATION
[7]   Frother-related research at McGill University [J].
Finch, JA ;
Gelinas, S ;
Moyo, P .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2006, 19 (6-8) :726-733
[8]  
FINCH JA, 1995, FLOTATION SCI ENG, P57
[9]   Effect of frothers on bubble size [J].
Grau, RA ;
Laskowski, JS ;
Heiskanen, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2005, 76 (04) :225-233
[10]   A comparison between capillary and imaging techniques for sizing bubbles in flotation systems [J].
Hernandez-Aguilar, JR ;
Coleman, RG ;
Gomez, CO ;
Finch, JA .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2004, 17 (01) :53-61