The distribution and predictive value of Bishop scores in nulliparas between 37 and 42 weeks gestation

被引:10
作者
Nielsen, Peter E. [1 ]
Howard, Bobby C. [1 ]
Crabtree, Tami [1 ]
Batig, Alison L. [1 ]
Pates, Jason A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Madigan Hlth Syst, Tacoma, WA USA
关键词
Cesarean; Bishop score; distribution; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; SPONTANEOUS LABOR; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; RISK; TERM; COMPLICATIONS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2011.573831
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. The natural distribution and predictive accuracy of Bishop scores was evaluated to predict cesarean delivery (CD) in nulliparas between 37 and 42 weeks gestation. Study design. Subjects underwent serial digital cervical examinations. The Bishop score was evaluated as a binary and continuous factor to predict CD at each gestational week beginning at 37 weeks. Bishop scores were categorized as <= 5 or > 5, and CD rates were compared across Bishop score categories using chi-square or Fisher exact tests at each gestational week beginning at 37 weeks. Results. In all, 171 patients were prospectively followed. The overall CD rate was 27.5%. The prevalence of unfavorable Bishop scores, categorized as <= 5, decreased with increasing gestation age until 41 weeks. CD rates for the cohort with unfavorable Bishop scores was higher than those with favorable scores at each week. The likelihood ratio for CD was 1.35-2.00, depending on gestational age. The Bishop score that best predicted subsequent vaginal delivery following expectant management was > 3 at 37 weeks and > 5 at 39 weeks. Conclusion. A Bishop score <= 5 between 37 and 39 weeks gestation predicts a higher CD rate compared to patients with a Bishop score > 5 implying an intrinsically higher CD risk despite expectant management.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 285
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Amano K, 1999, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, V25, P33
  • [2] [Anonymous], ACOG PRACT B
  • [3] Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Nicholson, James M.
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Lyell, Deirdre J.
    Washington, A. Eugene
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (03) : 700 - 705
  • [4] Systematic Review: Elective Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management of Pregnancy
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Sundaram, Vandana
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Gienger, Allison
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    McDonald, Kathryn M.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Bravata, Dena M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (04) : 252 - W63
  • [5] Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation
    Caughey, AB
    Musci, TJ
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [6] COLE RA, 1975, LANCET, V1, P767
  • [7] Factors predicting labor induction success: A critical analysis
    Crane, Joan M. G.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03) : 573 - 584
  • [8] FRIEDMAN EA, 1966, OBSTET GYNECOL, V28, P495
  • [9] Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix
    Johnson, DP
    Davis, NR
    Brown, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1565 - 1569
  • [10] ELECTIVE INDUCTION VERSUS SPONTANEOUS LABOR - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOME
    MACER, JA
    MACER, CL
    CHAN, LS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (06) : 1690 - 1697