The timing of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: a single-center experience with 6869 consecutive patients

被引:19
作者
Cloney, Michael B. [1 ]
Hopkins, Benjamin [2 ]
Dhillon, Ekamjeet S. [2 ]
Dahdaleh, Nader S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
venous thromboembolism; pulmonary embolism; deep vein thrombosis; spine surgery; chemoprophylaxis; anticoagulation; DVT; vascular disorders; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; RISK-FACTORS; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; PREVALENCE; FUSION; ANTICOAGULATION; COMPLICATIONS; ARTHROPLASTY; METAANALYSIS; PROPHYLAXIS;
D O I
10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161399
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), including both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after spine surgery. Prophylactic anticoagulation, or chemoprophylaxis, can prevent VTE. However, the timing of VTEs after spine surgery and the effect of chemoprophylaxis on VTE timing remain underinvestigated. METHODS The records of 6869 consecutive spine surgeries were retrospectively examined. Data on patient demographics, surgical variables, hospital course, and timing of VTEs were collected. Patients who received chemoprophylaxis were compared with those who did not. Appropriate regression models were used to examine selection for chemoprophylaxis and the timing of VTEs. RESULTS Age (OR 1.037, 95% CI 1.023-1.051; p < 0.001), longer surgery (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004; p < 0.001), history of DVT (OR 1.697, 95% CI 1.038-2.776; p = 0.035), and fusion surgery (OR 1.917, 95% CI 1.356-2.709; p < 0.001) predicted selection for chemoprophylaxis. Chemoprophylaxis patients experienced more VTEs (3.62% vs 2.03% of patients, respectively; p < 0.001), and also required longer hospital stays (5.0 days vs 1.0 days; HR 0.5107; p < 0.0001) and had a greater time to the occurrence of VTE (median 6.8 days vs 3.6 days; HR 0.6847; p = 0.0003). The cumulative incidence of VTEs correlated with the postoperative day in both groups (Spearman r = 0.9746, 95% CI 0.9457-0.9883, and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; Spearman r = 0.9061, 95% CI 0.8065-0.9557, and p < 0.0001 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), and the cumulative incidence of VTEs was higher in the nonchemoprophylaxis group throughout the 30-day postoperative period. Cumulative VTE incidence and postoperative day were linearly correlated in the first 2 postoperative weeks (R = 0.9396 and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; R = 0.8190 and p = 0.0003 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group) and the remainder of the 30-day postoperative period (R = 0.9535 and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; R = 0.6562 and p = 0.0058 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), but the linear relationships differ between these 2 postoperative periods (p < 0.0001 for both groups). CONCLUSIONS Anticoagulation reduces the cumulative incidence of VTE after spine surgery. The cumulative incidence of VTEs rises linearly in the first 2 postoperative weeks and then plateaus. Surgeons should consider early initiation of chemoprophylaxis for patients undergoing spine surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   Surgeon Practices Regarding Postoperative Thromboembolic Prophylaxis After High-Risk Spinal Surgery [J].
Glotzbecker, Michael P. ;
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Harris, Mitchel B. ;
Brick, Gregory ;
Heary, Robert F. ;
Wood, Kirkham B. .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (26) :2915-2921
[12]   Thromboembolic Disease in Spinal Surgery A Systematic Review [J].
Glotzbecker, Michael P. ;
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Wood, Kirkham B. ;
Harris, Mitchell B. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (03) :291-303
[13]   Venous Thromboembolic Events After Spinal Fusion: Which Patients Are at High Risk? [J].
Goz, Vadim ;
McCarthy, Ian ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey H. ;
Dallas, Kai ;
Bendo, John A. ;
Lafage, Virginie ;
Errico, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (11) :936-942
[14]   Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery [J].
Gray, Darryl T. ;
Deyo, Richard A. ;
Kreuter, William ;
Mirza, Sohail K. ;
Heagerty, Patrick J. ;
Comstock, Bryan A. ;
Chan, Leighton .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (17) :1957-1963
[15]   Recurrent venous thromboembolism after deep vein thrombosis -: Incidence and risk factors [J].
Hansson, PO ;
Sörbo, J ;
Eriksson, H .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (06) :769-774
[16]  
LOWE GDO, 1992, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V305, P567
[17]   Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Spinal Cord Injury: Not All Levels Are the Same [J].
Maung, Adrian A. ;
Schuster, Kevin M. ;
Kaplan, Lewis J. ;
Maerz, Linda L. ;
Davis, Kimberly A. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 71 (05) :1241-1245
[18]   Time to Event Analysis for the Development of Venous Thromboembolism After Spinal Fusion ≥5 Levels [J].
McClendon, Jamal, Jr. ;
Smith, Timothy R. ;
O'Shaughnessy, Brian A. ;
Sugrue, Patrick A. ;
Thompson, Sara E. ;
Koski, Tyler R. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (03) :826-833
[19]   Deep venous thrombosis after posterior spinal surgery [J].
Oda, T ;
Fuji, T ;
Kato, Y ;
Fujita, S ;
Kanemitsu, N .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) :2962-2967
[20]   Pulmonary embolism after adult spinal deformity surgery [J].
Pateder, Dhruv B. ;
Gonzales, Ricardo A. ;
Kebaish, Khaled M. ;
Antezana, David F. ;
Cohen, David B. ;
Chang, Jen-Yi ;
Kostuik, John P. .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (03) :301-305