The Long-term Gastrointestinal Functional Outcomes Following Curative Anterior Resection in Adults With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:71
|
作者
Scheer, Adena S. [1 ]
Boushey, Robin P. [1 ]
Liang, Shuyin [2 ]
Doucette, Steve [3 ]
O'Connor, Annette M. [1 ]
Moher, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Program, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
关键词
Anterior resection; Gastrointestinal function; Rectal cancer; Systematic review; COLONIC J-POUCH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; DOUBLE-STAPLING TECHNIQUE; SHORT-COURSE RADIOTHERAPY; TO-END ANASTOMOSIS; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ANAL ANASTOMOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182214f11
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Significant variability and a lack of transparency exist in the reporting of anterior resection outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to qualitatively analyze the long-term functional outcomes and assessment tools used in evaluating patients with rectal cancer following anterior resection, to quantify the incidence of these outcomes, and to identify risk factors for long-term incontinence. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched using the terms rectal neoplasms, resection, and gastrointestinal function. STUDY SELECTION: The studies included were in English and evaluated adults with rectal cancer, curative anterior resection, and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients with recurrent/metastatic disease were excluded. Of the 805 records identified, 48 articles were included. INTERVENTION: The intervention performed was anterior resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was incontinence (gas, liquid stool, and solid stool). RESULTS: The histories of 3349 patients from 17 countries were summarized. Surgeries were conducted between 1978 to 2004 with a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 12, 57). Sixty-five percent of studies did not use a validated assessment tool. Reported outcomes and incidence rates were variable. The reported proportion of patients with incontinence ranged from 3.2% to 79.3%, with a pooled incidence of 35.2% (95% CI 27.9, 43.3). Risk factors for incontinence, identified by meta-regression, were preoperative radiation 0.009 and, in particular, short-course radiation (P = .006), and study quality (randomized controlled trial P = .004, observational P = .006). LIMITATIONS: The meta-analysis was limited by the significant heterogeneity of the primary data. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes are inconsistently assessed and reported and require common definitions, and the more regular use of validated assessment tools, as well. Preoperative radiation and, in particular, short-course radiation may be a strong risk factor for incontinence; however, further studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1597
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Short-term outcomes of stents in obstructive rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Trabulsi, Nora H.
    Halawani, Hajar M.
    Alshahrani, Esraa A.
    Alamoudi, Rawan M.
    Jambi, Sama K.
    Akeel, Nouf Y.
    Farsi, Ali H.
    Nassif, Mohammed O.
    Samkari, Ali A.
    Saleem, Abdulaziz M.
    Malibary, Nadim H.
    Abbas, Mohammad M.
    Gianotti, Luca
    Lamazza, Antonietta
    Yoon, Jin Young
    Farsi, Nada J.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (03) : 127 - 135
  • [32] Long-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality following Kawasaki disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lao, Francis
    Robinson, Cal H.
    Borovsky, Dorota
    Ewusie, Joycelyne
    Beattie, Karen
    Batthish, Michelle
    PAEDIATRICS & CHILD HEALTH, 2025,
  • [33] Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martinez-Perez, Aleix
    Carra, Maria Clotilde
    Brunetti, Francesco
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (44) : 7906 - 7916
  • [34] Standard Versus Extralevator Abdominoperineal Low Rectal Cancer Excision Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    De Nardi, Paola
    Summo, Valeria
    Vignali, Andrea
    Capretti, Giovanni
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) : 2997 - 3006
  • [35] There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes
    M. Pędziwiatr
    P. Małczak
    M. Mizera
    J. Witowski
    G. Torbicz
    P. Major
    M. Pisarska
    M. Wysocki
    A. Budzyński
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2017, 21 : 595 - 604
  • [36] There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes
    Pedziwiatr, M.
    Malczak, P.
    Mizera, M.
    Witowski, J.
    Torbicz, G.
    Major, P.
    Pisarska, M.
    Wysocki, M.
    Budzynski, A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (08) : 595 - 604
  • [37] The Influence of Circumferential Resection Margins on Long-Term Outcomes Following Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Tilney, Henry S.
    Rasheed, Shahnawaz
    Northover, John M.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (10) : 1723 - 1729
  • [38] Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Musters, Gijsbert D.
    Buskens, Christianne J.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (09) : 1129 - 1139
  • [39] Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lim, Sang Woo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (12) : 1741 - 1753
  • [40] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes
    Jin-bo Jiang
    Kun Jiang
    Yong Dai
    Ru-xia Wang
    Wei-zhi Wu
    Jing-jing Wang
    Fu-bo Xie
    Xue-mei Li
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19 : 1497 - 1512