The Long-term Gastrointestinal Functional Outcomes Following Curative Anterior Resection in Adults With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:71
|
作者
Scheer, Adena S. [1 ]
Boushey, Robin P. [1 ]
Liang, Shuyin [2 ]
Doucette, Steve [3 ]
O'Connor, Annette M. [1 ]
Moher, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Program, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
关键词
Anterior resection; Gastrointestinal function; Rectal cancer; Systematic review; COLONIC J-POUCH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; DOUBLE-STAPLING TECHNIQUE; SHORT-COURSE RADIOTHERAPY; TO-END ANASTOMOSIS; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ANAL ANASTOMOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182214f11
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Significant variability and a lack of transparency exist in the reporting of anterior resection outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to qualitatively analyze the long-term functional outcomes and assessment tools used in evaluating patients with rectal cancer following anterior resection, to quantify the incidence of these outcomes, and to identify risk factors for long-term incontinence. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched using the terms rectal neoplasms, resection, and gastrointestinal function. STUDY SELECTION: The studies included were in English and evaluated adults with rectal cancer, curative anterior resection, and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients with recurrent/metastatic disease were excluded. Of the 805 records identified, 48 articles were included. INTERVENTION: The intervention performed was anterior resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was incontinence (gas, liquid stool, and solid stool). RESULTS: The histories of 3349 patients from 17 countries were summarized. Surgeries were conducted between 1978 to 2004 with a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 12, 57). Sixty-five percent of studies did not use a validated assessment tool. Reported outcomes and incidence rates were variable. The reported proportion of patients with incontinence ranged from 3.2% to 79.3%, with a pooled incidence of 35.2% (95% CI 27.9, 43.3). Risk factors for incontinence, identified by meta-regression, were preoperative radiation 0.009 and, in particular, short-course radiation (P = .006), and study quality (randomized controlled trial P = .004, observational P = .006). LIMITATIONS: The meta-analysis was limited by the significant heterogeneity of the primary data. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes are inconsistently assessed and reported and require common definitions, and the more regular use of validated assessment tools, as well. Preoperative radiation and, in particular, short-course radiation may be a strong risk factor for incontinence; however, further studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1597
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Preoperative Radiotherapy on Long-Term Bowel Function in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Liang, Zongyu
    Zhang, Zhaojun
    Wu, Deqing
    Huang, Chengzhi
    Chen, Xin
    Hu, Weixian
    Wang, Junjiang
    Feng, Xingyu
    Yao, Xueqing
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [2] The impact of anastomotic leakage on oncology after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Lushun
    Pang, Xinyuan
    Ji, Guofeng
    Sun, Haojie
    Fan, Qihao
    Ma, Chong
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (37) : E22139
  • [3] Meta-analysis of reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Huettner, F. J.
    Tenckhoff, S.
    Jensen, K.
    Uhlmann, L.
    Kulu, Y.
    Buechler, M. W.
    Diener, M. K.
    Ulrich, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (07) : 735 - 745
  • [4] Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Liu, Huabing
    Xiong, Ming
    Zeng, Yu
    Shi, Yabo
    Pei, Zhihui
    Liao, Chuanwen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [5] Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Zhong
    Jiang, Zheng-Li
    Chen, Dan-Yang
    Chen, Min-Fang
    Chen, Li-Hua
    Zhou, Peng
    Xia, Ai-Xiao
    Zhu, Yan-Wu
    Jin, Hui
    Ge, Qiang-Qiang
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (50)
  • [6] Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qin, Hua
    Yu, Dongjun
    Ye, Shanping
    Shan, Renfeng
    Ai, Junhua
    Shi, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 80 : 225 - 230
  • [7] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes
    Jiang, Jin-bo
    Jiang, Kun
    Dai, Yong
    Wang, Ru-xia
    Wu, Wei-zhi
    Wang, Jing-jing
    Xie, Fu-bo
    Li, Xue-mei
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (08) : 1497 - 1512
  • [8] Short-term and Long-term Outcomes Regarding Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Jin-bo
    Jiang, Kun
    Wang, Jing-jing
    Dai, Yong
    Xie, Fu-bo
    Li, Xue-mei
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (04) : 286 - 296
  • [9] Long-term functional follow-up after anterior rectal resection for cancer
    Sturiale, Alessandro
    Martellucci, Jacopo
    Zurli, Letizia
    Vaccaro, Carla
    Brusciano, Luigi
    Limongelli, Paolo
    Docimo, Ludovico
    Valeri, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (01) : 83 - 88
  • [10] Long-term oncologic outcomes of transanal TME compared with transabdominal TME for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moon, Jae Young
    Lee, Min Ro
    Ha, Gi Won
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (05): : 3122 - 3135