A Review of Functional Analysis Methods Conducted in Public School Classroom Settings

被引:35
作者
Lloyd, Blair P. [1 ]
Weaver, Emily S. [1 ]
Staubitz, Johanna L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Special Educ, Peabody Coll Educ & Human Dev, Box 228, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
Functional behavior assessment; Functional analysis; Problem behavior; Public schools; Classrooms; ESCAPE-TO-ATTENTION; PROBLEM BEHAVIOR; STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS; DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIORS; STUDENTS; INTERVENTION; DISORDERS; VARIABLES; RELIABILITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10864-015-9243-y
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The use of functional behavior assessments (FBAs) to address problem behavior in classroom settings has increased as a result of education legislation and long-standing evidence supporting function-based interventions. Although functional analysis remains the standard for identifying behavior-environment functional relations, this component is rarely included in FBAs in practice. To address this research-to-practice gap, we searched the FBA literature to identify studies including functional analyses (FAs) conducted in students' usual classrooms and implemented by school personnel in public school settings. FAs were defined broadly as assessments involving systematic manipulation of one or more antecedent or consequent variable to evaluate environmental influences on student problem behavior. We identified 39 studies including FAs for 88 participants. All studies were coded with regard to FA approaches and procedures as well as student, classroom, and implementer characteristics. In addition, we evaluated the extent to which FA methods in the study sample aligned with previous recommendations to address practical barriers to implementation. Results revealed a range of FA approaches that varied according to student and classroom characteristics, as well as several strategies to address implementation barriers that have been under-utilized in classroom-based FAs to date.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 356
页数:33
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Classroom-Based Functional Behavioral Assessment: Does the Literature Support High Fidelity Implementation? [J].
Allday, R. Allan ;
Nelson, J. Ron ;
Russel, Caroline S. .
JOURNAL OF DISABILITY POLICY STUDIES, 2011, 22 (03) :140-149
[2]   Use of a structured descriptive assessment methodology to identify variables affecting problem behavior [J].
Anderson, CM ;
Long, ES .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2002, 35 (02) :137-154
[3]   Functional Behavior Assessment in Schools: Current Status and Future Directions [J].
Anderson, Cynthia M. ;
Rodriguez, Billie Jo ;
Campbell, Amy .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL EDUCATION, 2015, 24 (03) :338-371
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, J INTELLECTUAL DEV D, DOI [10.1080/07263869500035621, DOI 10.1080/07263869500035621]
[5]  
Asmus J.M., 2002, EDUC TREAT CHILD, V25, P67
[6]   Effectiveness of Noncontingent Attention to Decrease Attention-Maintained Disruptive Behaviors in the General Education Classroom [J].
Banda, Devender R. ;
Sokolosky, Stephanie .
CHILD & FAMILY BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2012, 34 (02) :130-140
[7]  
Barton-Arwood SM, 2003, BEHAV DISORDERS, V28, P386
[8]   THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON THE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR [J].
Beavers, Gracie A. ;
Iwata, Brian A. ;
Lerman, Dorothea C. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2013, 46 (01) :1-21
[9]   Comparing functional analysis and paired-choice assessment results in classroom settings [J].
Berg, Wendy K. ;
Wacker, David P. ;
Cigrand, Karla ;
Merkle, Steve ;
Wade, Jeanie ;
Henry, Kim ;
Wang, Yu-Chia .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2007, 40 (03) :545-552
[10]   An example of an elementary school paraprofessional-implemented functional analysis and intervention [J].
Bessette, Kimberly K. ;
Wills, Howard P. .
BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2007, 32 (03) :192-210