Intimate Partner Physical Injury Risk Assessment in a Military Sample

被引:8
作者
Stith, Sandra M. [1 ]
Milner, Joel S. [2 ]
Fleming, Matthew [2 ]
Robichaux, Rene J. [3 ]
Travis, Wendy J. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Sch Family Studies & Human Serv, 101 Campus Creek Complex, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Northern Illinois Univ, Ctr Study Family Violence & Sexual Assault, Dept Psychol, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[3] US Army Med Command, Behav Hlth Div, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] US Air Force, Div Mental Hlth, Washington, DC USA
[5] US Air Force Acad, Colorado Springs, CO USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
risk assessment; intimate partner violence; physical injury; domestic violence; military; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; VIOLENCE; RECIDIVISM; INFERENCE; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1037/a0039969
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: This paper describes the development of an actuarial risk assessment instrument (the Intimate Partner Physical Injury-Risk Assessment Tool; IPPI-RAT) designed to be used by military providers to assess the likelihood that an individual who has had an alleged incident of intimate partner violence (IPV) will have a subsequent incident resulting in a physical injury to the victim. Method: Providers used a 58-item structured risk assessment tool to assess individuals with alleged IPV incidents (N = 199). Across a 6-month period, alleged victims were asked to call an automated telephone system to report subsequent incidents of IPV and physical injury (N = 1,082 calls). An item analysis was used to select the items that significantly differentiated the "physical injury" group from the "other" group (i.e., comparison group). Results: Fifteen items from the 58-item tool significantly predicted future physical injury and were used to create a 15-item IPPI-RAT scale. The area under the curve (Area Under the Receiver Operator Curve, AUC) value for the tool was .78, 95% CI [.71, .86]. This AUC value indicates there is a 78% chance that a randomly selected member of the physical injury group would have a higher risk score than a randomly selected member of the "other" (i.e., comparison) group. Conclusions: Findings support the tool's utility for assessing risk for future physical injury as part of a comprehensive IPV risk assessment in reported IPV incidents in the military.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 541
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Altman D, 2000, Statistics with confidence, V2nd, P45
[2]  
Black M.C., 2013, Prevalence of intimate partner violence, stalking, and sexual violence among active duty women and wives of active duty mencomparisons with women in the US general population, 2010
[3]  
Black Michele C., 2011, The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report
[4]  
Byrne C A, 1996, Violence Vict, V11, P213
[5]   The Danger Assessment Validation of a Lethality Risk Assessment Instrument for Intimate Partner Femicide [J].
Campbell, Jacquelyn C. ;
Webster, Daniel W. ;
Glass, Nancy .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2009, 24 (04) :653-674
[6]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[7]   Inference by eye - Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data [J].
Cumming, G ;
Finch, S .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 60 (02) :170-180
[8]  
Cumming G, 2005, UNDERSTANDING NEW ST
[9]  
Defense Task Force, 2002, 2 ANN REP DEF TASK F
[10]   Prevalence of Physical Violence in Intimate - Relationships, Part 1: Rates of Male and Female Victimization [J].
Desmarais, Sarah L. ;
Reeves, Kim A. ;
Nicholls, Tonia L. ;
Telford, Robin P. ;
Fiebert, Martin S. .
PARTNER ABUSE, 2012, 3 (02) :140-169