Predicting range shifts of pikas (Mammalia, Ochotonidae) in China under scenarios incorporating land use change, climate change and dispersal limitations

被引:19
|
作者
Ma, Liang [1 ]
Mi, Chun-rong [2 ]
Qu, Jia-peng [3 ]
Ge, De-yan [4 ]
Yang, Qi-sen [4 ]
Wilcove, David S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, Key Lab Anim Ecol & Conservat Biol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Plateau Biol, Key Lab Adaptat & Evolut Plateau Biota, Xining, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, Key Lab Zool Systemat & Evolut, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
climate change; dispersal; elevation; land use change; occupied habitat; pika; species distribution; AMERICAN PIKA; HABITAT LOSS; MODELS; IMPACT; BIODIVERSITY; UNCERTAINTY; PROJECTIONS; POPULATION; EXTINCTION; GRASSLAND;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13408
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Two of the most important forces affecting biodiversity are land use change (LUC) and global climate change (GCC). Previous studies have modelled their impacts on species separately, and together, but few have done so for multiple species with dispersal limitations incorporated into the models. Location Qinghai-Tibet plateau region. Methods We integrate species distribution models plus a dispersal model to predict LUC and GCC impacts on the ranges of five species of pikas in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau region of China. Pikas are sensitive to land use and climate change and have limited dispersal abilities. Results The predicted impacts of LUC and GCC on pikas vary between species as well as between LUC and GCC projections. Incorporation of dispersal limitations appreciably restricts the amount of colonized habitat. For all five species, the amount of habitat abandoned or colonized when LUC and GCC are modelled together is less than the sum of LUC and GCC modelled separately. Three of the five species experience a net increase in occupied habitat by 2080 relative to their current ranges under all modelled projections. However, relative to a "Dispersal Only" baseline scenario that assumes no environmental change but continued range expansion into suitable, unoccupied habitat, all five species suffer a net loss of occupied habitat by 2080 under some or all projections. Main conclusions Predictions of future distributions of species based solely on LUC or GCC, as well as predictions assuming additive impacts, can be misleading. Inclusion of dispersal limitations in models markedly alters predicted future distributions of species. The use of a "Dispersal Only" scenario provides a different and perhaps more accurate way to gauge net impacts to species. Future work should consider incorporating all these parameters to better predict the impacts of LUC and GCC on biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:2384 / 2396
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identifying the runoff variation in the Naryn River Basin under multiple climate and land-use change scenarios
    Wu, J. S.
    Li, Y. P.
    Sun, J.
    Gao, P. P.
    Huang, G. H.
    Liu, J.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (02) : 574 - 592
  • [42] Assessing Hydrological Ecosystem Services in a Rubber-Dominated Watershed under Scenarios of Land Use and Climate Change
    Thellmann, Kevin
    Golbon, Reza
    Cotter, Marc
    Cadisch, Georg
    Asch, Folkard
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (02):
  • [43] Conditions for successful range shifts under climate change: The role of species dispersal and landscape configuration
    Arevall, Jonatan
    Early, Regan
    Estrada, Alba
    Wennergren, Uno
    Eklof, Anna C.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2018, 24 (11) : 1598 - 1611
  • [44] Modeling Land-Use and Land-Cover Change and Hydrological Responses under Consistent Climate Change Scenarios in the Heihe River Basin, China
    Ling Zhang
    Zhuotong Nan
    Wenjun Yu
    Yingchun Ge
    Water Resources Management, 2015, 29 : 4701 - 4717
  • [45] Large-scale impact of climate change vs. land-use change on future biome shifts in Latin America
    Boit, Alice
    Sakschewski, Boris
    Boysen, Lena
    Cano-Crespo, Ana
    Clement, Jan
    Garcia-alaniz, Nashieli
    Kok, Kasper
    Kolb, Melanie
    Langerwisch, Fanny
    Rammig, Anja
    Sachse, Rene
    van Eupen, Michiel
    von Bloh, Werner
    Zemp, Delphine Clara
    Thonicke, Kirsten
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (11) : 3689 - 3701
  • [46] Riparian responses to extreme climate and land-use change scenarios
    Fernandes, Maria Rosario
    Segurado, Pedro
    Jauch, Eduardo
    Ferreira, Maria Teresa
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 569 : 145 - 158
  • [47] Misleading prioritizations from modelling range shifts under climate change
    Sofaer, Helen R.
    Jarnevich, Catherine S.
    Flather, Curtis H.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2018, 27 (06): : 658 - 666
  • [48] Modeling Land-Use and Land-Cover Change and Hydrological Responses under Consistent Climate Change Scenarios in the Heihe River Basin, China
    Zhang, Ling
    Nan, Zhuotong
    Yu, Wenjun
    Ge, Yingchun
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (13) : 4701 - 4717
  • [49] Habitat shifts of the vulnerable crinoid Leptometra phalangium under climate change scenarios
    Millot, Jade
    Georges, Vincent
    Lauria, Valentina
    Hattab, Tarek
    Dominguez-Carrio, Carlos
    Gerovasileiou, Vasilis
    Smith, Christopher J.
    Mytilineou, Chryssi
    Farriols, M. Teresa
    Fabri, Marie-Claire
    Carbonara, Pierluigi
    Massi, Daniela
    Rinelli, Paola
    Profeta, Adriana
    Chimienti, Giovanni
    Jadaud, Angelique
    Thasitis, Ioannis
    Camilleri, Kelly
    Mifsud, Jurgen
    Vaz, Sandrine
    PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2024, 229
  • [50] Migration rate limitations on climate change-induced range shifts in Cape Proteaceae
    Midgley, G. F.
    Hughes, G. O.
    Thuiller, W.
    Rebelo, A. G.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2006, 12 (05) : 555 - 562