Life cycle based emergy analysis on China's cement production

被引:54
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Wenjing [2 ]
Geng, Yong [1 ]
Ohnishi, Satoshi [3 ]
Sun, Lu [4 ]
Han, Wenyi [1 ]
Tian, Xu [2 ]
Zhong, Shaozhuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Key Lab Pollut Ecol & Environm Engn, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
[3] Tokyo Univ Sci, Dept Ind Adm, Fac Sci & Engn, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 2788510, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Dept Environm Syst, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778563, Japan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emergy; Life cycle inventory; Cement; Unit emergy value; Key factors; ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT; CO2; EMISSIONS; SUSTAINABILITY; INDUSTRY; PERSPECTIVE; ELECTRICITY; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.036
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To evaluate the sustainability of cement production in China, a life cycle inventory (LCI) based emergy analysis (EMA) method was employed in this study. According to Taylor series expansions, uncertainty analysis was also performed in order to improve the accuracy of the results. Direct renewable resources, nonrenewable resources, imported materials and energy, transport of materials, as well as ecological service for emissions dilution and CO2 uptake were included in this study. The unit emergy value (UEV) of cement was 1.93 x 10(15) sej/t with service and 1.92 x 10(15) sej/t without service, respectively. Uncertainty analysis shows that the GSD(2) of the total emergy needed for cement production was 1.83. Results also indicate that key factors making dominant contributions to the total emergy needed for cement production were the consumptions of limestone, coal, and electricity. Emergy-based indicators indicate that cement industry in China brought higher environmental burden and is not sustainable. Furthermore, the results suggest that adjusting industrial structure, improving energy efficiency, and applying alternatives to replace raw materials are effective approaches to improve the sustainability of cement industry. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, EVALUATION RECYCLING
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U FLORIDA GAI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[4]  
[Anonymous], ECOL MODEL
[5]  
Brown M.T., 2001, Handbook of emergy evaluation. A compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of folios, Folio, V3
[6]   On boundaries and 'investments' in Emergy Synthesis and LCA: A case study on thermal vs. photovoltaic electricity [J].
Brown, Mark T. ;
Raugei, Marco ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 15 (01) :227-235
[7]   Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas [J].
Brown, Mark T. ;
Protano, Gaetano ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (03) :879-887
[8]   Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options [J].
Brown, MT ;
Buranakarn, V .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2003, 38 (01) :1-22
[9]   Evaluating CO2 emission performance in China's cement industry: An enterprise perspective [J].
Cai, Bofeng ;
Wang, Jinnan ;
He, Jie ;
Geng, Yong .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 166 :191-200
[10]  
Cao L.M., 2013, J DALIAN U TECHNOL, V53, P766