Effect of Chilling Temperature on the Long-Term Survival of Rabbit Spermatozoa held Either in a Tris-Based or a Jellified Extender

被引:49
作者
Rosato, M. P. [1 ]
Iaffaldano, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Molise, Dept Anim Vegetable & Environm Sci, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
关键词
LIQUID STORAGE; SOLID STORAGE; BOAR SEMEN; REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE; ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; GOAT SEMEN; SPERM; 15-DEGREES-C; 5-DEGREES-C; FERTILITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01667.x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Contents As the preservation of the fertilizing capacity of rabbit spermatozoa for several days after semen collection remains a major target for the artificial insemination programs of rabbit breeding, a study was conducted to compare the efficacy of 5 or 15 degrees C as holding temperature in lengthening the preservability of rabbit semen quality during 192 h of storage both in a solid (Cunigel) and a liquid (Tris-Citric acid-Glucose; TCG) extender. Six pooled semen samples (two ejaculates/male; two-three males/pool) were taken and made four aliquots: two aliquots were tenfold diluted with the TCG extender, whereas the other two were tenfold diluted with the Cunigel extender. One aliquot per diluent was stored at 5 degrees C and the second one at 15 degrees C. Sperm motility (light microscope), viability (SyBr-PI staining), plasma membrane functional integrity (Hypo-osmotic swelling test) and acrosome integrity (PSA-FITC staining) were recorded at 0, 48, 120 and 192 h of storage. In liquid-stored spermatozoa, mass motility and viability were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in samples stored at 5 degrees C than at 15 degrees C at all the storage times; at 5 degrees C resulted also higher (p < 0.05) the percentages of both forward motility at 48 h and sperm functional integrity at 120 and 192 h of storage, whereas chilling temperature did not affect acrosome integrity. With the Cunigel extender, all the semen qualitative parameters were significantly higher in sample stored at 5 than 15 degrees C over storage time (p < 0.05); only acrosome integrity at 192 h was not different according to the chilling temperatures. In conclusion, 5 degrees C were better than 15 degrees C for the long-term storage of rabbit semen both in the TCG and Cunigel extender.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Aksoy M, 2008, WORLD RABBIT SCI, V16, P1
[2]   Characterization of lower temperature storage limitations of fresh-extended porcine semen [J].
Althouse, GC ;
Wilson, ME ;
Kuster, C ;
Parsley, M .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 1998, 50 (04) :535-543
[3]   Comparison of different extenders with defined protein composition for storage of stallion spermatozoa at 5°C [J].
Aurich, C. ;
Seeber, P. ;
Mueller-Schloesser, F. .
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2007, 42 (04) :445-448
[4]   Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, eagle, and peregrine falcon spermatozoa [J].
Blanco, JM ;
Gee, G ;
Wildt, DE ;
Donoghue, AM .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2000, 63 (04) :1164-1171
[5]  
Boiti C, 2005, WORLD RABBIT SCI, V13, P71
[6]   The relationship between rabbit semen characteristics and reproductive performance after artificial insemination [J].
Brun, JM ;
Theau-Clément, M ;
Bolet, G .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2002, 70 (1-2) :139-149
[7]   Effect of different number of frozen spermatozoa inseminated on the reproductive performance of rabbit does [J].
Castellini, Cesare ;
Pizzi, Flavia ;
Theau-Clement, Michele ;
Lattaioli, Paolo .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2006, 66 (09) :2182-2187
[8]  
Daniel N, 2010, COLD SPRING HARB PRO, V2010, DOI 10.1101/pdb.prot.5358
[9]   The preservability of turkey semen quality during liquid storage in relation to strain and age of males [J].
Iaffaldano, N. ;
Manchisi, A. ;
Rosato, M. P. .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2008, 109 (1-4) :266-273
[10]   The irradiation of rabbit sperm cells with He-Ne laser prevents their in vitro liquid storage dependent damage [J].
Iaffaldano, Nicolaia ;
Rosato, Maria Pina ;
Paventi, Gianluca ;
Pizzuto, Roberto ;
Gambacorta, Mario ;
Manchisi, Angelo ;
Passarella, Salvatore .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2010, 119 (1-2) :123-129