Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer

被引:127
作者
Guo, Lili [1 ]
Li, Houjian [1 ]
Cao, Xuxin [1 ]
Cao, Andi [1 ]
Huang, Minjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Econ, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Agricultural subsidies; Chemical fertilizer; Control function approach; Mediation analysis; China; NITROGEN-USE EFFICIENCY; RICE PRODUCTION; FOOD SECURITY; GRAIN SUBSIDY; MORAL HAZARD; FARM SIZE; CHINA; MANAGEMENT; DETERMINANTS; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural subsidies lead to changes in the use of chemical fertilizer by farmers. Using data from a household survey conducted annually by the Rural Economy Research Center of the Ministry of Agriculture of China from 2014 to 2018, Control Function (CF) approach and Heteroskedasticity-based identification strategy were employed to analyze the impact of agricultural subsidies on chemical fertilizer use by rice farmers. After addressing the problem of endogeneity, we found that agricultural subsidies have a significantly negative impact on the use of chemical fertilizer. Precisely, every 100% increase in agricultural subsidies would result in an average decrease of 3.4% in chemical fertilizer use. In addition, results of heterogeneity analysis showed that agricultural subsidies had a stronger negative impact on fertilizer use as rice-planting experience increases. But the ability of rice-planting management and off-farm labor within household could reduce this negative impact. We also found that the effect of arable land productivity conservation subsidies policy was short-lived. Furthermore, based on the frame of structural equation model (SEM), the results of mediation analysis showed that agricultural machine and rice-planting area had partial mediation of 5.3% and 41%, respectively. It implied that agricultural subsidies reduced fertilizer use by promoting the adoption of agricultural techniques and expanding the planting area. In brief, agricultural subsidies had both technical effect and scale effect. But the mediating effect of household income was not significant. This study is intended to assist the concerned authority and agriculture sector to understand the positive role of agricultural subsidies in sustainable production, and provides some feasible policy proposals.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 107 条
[61]   Factors associated with small-scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings [J].
Mottaleb, Khondoker Abdul ;
Krupnik, Timothy J. ;
Erenstein, Olaf .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2016, 46 :155-168
[62]  
NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2018, CHIN CIT STAT YB
[63]   Globalisation and national trends in nutrition and health: A grouped fixed-effects approach to intercountry heterogeneity [J].
Oberlander, Lisa ;
Disdier, Anne-Celia ;
Etile, Fabrice .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (09) :1146-1161
[64]  
Okuma L.O., 2017, J AGRI FOOD, V4, P9
[65]   Soil fertility management on small farms in Africa: evidence from Nakuru District, Kenya [J].
Omamo, SW ;
Williams, JC ;
Obare, GA ;
Ndiwa, NN .
FOOD POLICY, 2002, 27 (02) :159-170
[66]   Improving nitrogen fertilization in rice by site-specific N management. A review [J].
Peng, Shaobing ;
Buresh, Roland J. ;
Huang, Jianliang ;
Zhong, Xuhua ;
Zou, Yingbin ;
Yang, Jianchang ;
Wang, Guanghuo ;
Liu, Yuanying ;
Hu, Ruifa ;
Tang, Qiyuan ;
Cui, Kehui ;
Zhang, Fusuo ;
Dobermann, Achim .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 30 (03) :649-656
[68]   The effect of off-farm work on the intensity of agricultural production [J].
Phimister, E. ;
Roberts, D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (04) :493-515
[69]  
Prasad R, 1998, CURR SCI INDIA, V75, P677
[70]   Subsidy or market reform? Rethinking China's farm consolidation strategy [J].
Rada, Nicholas ;
Wang, Chenggang ;
Qin, Lijian .
FOOD POLICY, 2015, 57 :93-103