True mitral annulus diameter is underestimated by two-dimensional echocardiography as evidenced by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging

Background Mitral annulus assessment is of great importance for the diagnosis and treatment of mitral valve disease. The present study sought to assess the value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for the assessment of true mitral annulus diameter (MAD). Methods One hundred and fifty patients (mean age 38 +/- 18 years) with adequate two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic image quality underwent assessment of MAD(2D) and MAD(3D) (with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography). In a subgroup of 30 patients true MAD was validated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results There was a good interobserver agreement for MAD(2D) (mean difference = -0.25 +/- 2.90 mm, agreement: -3.16, 2.66) and MAD(3D) (mean difference = 0.29 +/- 2.03, agreement = -1.74, 2.32). Measurements of MAD(2D) and MAD(3D) were well correlated (R = 0.81, P < 0.0001). However, MAD(3D) was significantly larger than MAD(2D) (3.7 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.8 cm, P < 0.0001). In the subgroup of 30 patients with MRI validation, MAD(3D) and MAD(MRI) were significantly larger than MAD(2D) (3.3 +/- 0.5 and 3.4 +/- 0.5 cm vs. 2.9 +/- 0.4 cm, both P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between MAD(MRI) and MAD(3D). Conclusion MAD(3D) can be reliably measured and is superior to MAD(2D) in the assessment of true mitral annular size.