Does institutional ownership discourage investment in corporate R&D?

被引:20
作者
Mishra, Chandra S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Coll Business, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
关键词
Corporate innovation; Managerial myopia; Institutional ownership; FIRM PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; INVESTORS; US; FINANCIALISATION; INCENTIVES; INNOVATION; AGENCY; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121837
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the influence of institutional investor ownership in a firm on their investment in R&D. We find partial support for managerial myopia in that at a higher level of institutional ownership, we find managers cut back R&D investment. We find a positive relation between institutional holdings in a firm and their investment in R&D till the institutional holdings in the firm reaches a threshold. Our results are consistent with the notion that managerial myopia sets in as the managers yield to institutional pressure when the institutional ownership level exceeds a threshold. Our results suggest that managers become sensitive to the pressure from institutional investors when the institutional ownership crosses a threshold. We find the greater the stock undervaluation, the lower the investment in R&D. We find stronger negative relation between institutional ownership and R&D when the firm's stock is more undervalued, consistent with the notion that managerial myopia worsens when the firm is more likely to be a takeover target as their stock becomes undervalued. We find banks, insurance companies, and public pension funds have a positive influence on the firm's R&D, but mutual funds and hedge funds have a negative influence on R&D. We find positive influence of dedicated institutional investors but negative influence of transient investors and quasi-indexers on corporate R&D.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Institutional Ownership, Tender Offers and Long-Term Investment
[3]  
Barradas R, 2017, REV POLIT ECON, V29, P376, DOI 10.1080/09538259.2017.1348574
[4]   Financialization and Portuguese real investment: A supportive or disruptive relationship? [J].
Barradas, Ricardo ;
Lagoa, Sergio .
JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 2017, 40 (03) :413-439
[5]  
BAYSINGER BD, 1991, ACAD MANAGE J, V34, P205, DOI 10.5465/256308
[6]   DO SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES LEAD TO UNDERINVESTMENT OR OVERINVESTMENT IN LONG-TERM PROJECTS [J].
BEBCHUK, LA ;
STOLE, LA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1993, 48 (02) :719-729
[7]   Lagged Explanatory Variables and the Estimation of Causal Effect [J].
Bellemare, Marc F. ;
Masaki, Takaaki ;
Pepinsky, Thomas B. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2017, 79 (03) :949-963
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ON CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING [J].
BETHEL, JE ;
LIEBESKIND, J .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 :15-31
[9]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[10]   How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? [J].
Brav, Alon ;
Jiang, Wei ;
Ma, Song ;
Tian, Xuan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 130 (02) :237-264