Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Subsequent Risk of Specific Invasive Breast Cancer Subtypes in the California Teachers Study

被引:44
作者
Saxena, Tanmai [2 ]
Lee, Eunjung [2 ]
Henderson, Katherine D. [3 ,4 ]
Clarke, Christina A. [5 ,6 ]
West, Dee [5 ]
Marshall, Sarah F. [7 ]
Deapen, Dennis [2 ]
Bernstein, Leslie [3 ,4 ]
Ursin, Giske [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dept Nutr, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ So Calif, Dept Prevent Med, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehens Canc Ctr, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Populat Sci, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[4] Beckman Res Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[5] No Calif Canc Ctr, Fremont, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
ESTROGEN PLUS PROGESTIN; HEALTHY POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; DIFFERENT REGIMENS; HISTOLOGIC TYPES; RECEPTOR STATUS; TRENDS; BENEFITS; AGE;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0162
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Although it is well established that combined estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) increases breast cancer risk, questions remain regarding the effect of different formulations of hormones, whether certain women are at particularly high risk, and whether risk varies by tumor subtype. Methods: We investigated hormone therapy (HT) use in relation to breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort; after a mean follow-up of 9.8 years, 2,857 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed. Results: Compared with women who had never used HT, women who reported 15 or more years of estrogen therapy (ET) use had a 19% greater risk of breast cancer (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.37), whereas women using EPT for 15 or more years had an 83% greater risk (95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.26). Breast cancer risk was highest among women using continuous combined EPT regimens. Risks associated with EPT and ET use were increased with duration of HT use for women with a body mass index (BMI) of <29.9 kg/m(2) but not for women with BMI of >= 30 kg/m(2). Elevated risks associated with EPT and ET use were confined to tumors that were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors and those that were HER2+ but were slightly diminished for HER2-tumors. Conclusions: Breast cancer risks increased with longer duration of ET and EPT use, and risks were highest for continuous-combined EPT use. Furthermore, risks varied by BMI and tumor subtype. Impact: These findings underscore the need for personalized risk-benefit discussions with women contemplating HT use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(9); 2366-78. (C) 2010 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:2366 / 2378
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Modern epidemiology
[2]   Hormone replacement therapy and incidence of hormone-dependent cancers in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study [J].
Bakken, L ;
Alsaker, E ;
Eggen, AE ;
Lund, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 112 (01) :130-134
[3]   Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry [J].
Bauer, Katrina R. ;
Brown, Monica ;
Cress, Rosemary D. ;
Parise, Carol A. ;
Caggiano, Vincent .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) :1721-1728
[4]  
Beral V, 1997, LANCET, V350, P1047, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08233-0
[5]  
Beral Valerie, 2003, Lancet, V362, P419
[6]   High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States) [J].
Bernstein, L ;
Allen, M ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Deapen, D ;
Horn-Ross, PL ;
Peel, D ;
Pinder, R ;
Reynolds, P ;
Sullivan-Halley, J ;
West, D ;
Wright, W ;
Ziogas, A ;
Ross, RK .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (07) :625-635
[7]   Current trends in hormone replacement therapy:: perceptions and usage [J].
Birkhaeuser, M. H. ;
Reinecke, I. .
CLIMACTERIC, 2008, 11 (03) :192-200
[8]   Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort [J].
Brinton, Louise A. ;
Richesson, Douglas ;
Leitzmann, Michael F. ;
Gierach, Gretchen L. ;
Schatzkin, Arthur ;
Mouw, Traci ;
Hollenbeck, Albert R. ;
Lacey, James V., Jr. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (11) :3150-3160
[9]   The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Dees, E. Claire ;
Sawyer, Lynda ;
Gatti, Lisa ;
Moore, Dominic T. ;
Collichio, Frances ;
Ollila, David W. ;
Sartor, Carolyn I. ;
Graham, Mark L. ;
Perou, Charles M. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) :2329-2334
[10]   Risk factors and hormone-receptor status: epidemiology, risk-prediction models and treatment implications for breast cancer [J].
Chen, Wendy Y. ;
Colditz, Graham A. .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2007, 4 (07) :415-423