Modeling epistemic subsurface reservoir uncertainty using a reverse Wiener jump-diffusion process

被引:6
作者
Lin, Jijun [1 ]
de Weck, Olivier [2 ]
MacGowan, David [3 ]
机构
[1] BP Amer Inc, Houston, TX 77079 USA
[2] MIT, Engn Syst Div, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] BP Explorat Operating Co Ltd, Sunbury On Thames TW16 7BP, Middx, England
关键词
Wiener process; Jump-diffusion; Reservoir uncertainty; Epistemic uncertainty; Stochastic model; Monte Carlo simulation; OPTION VALUATION; METHODOLOGY; EXPLORATION; PREDICTION; ASSETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.015
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper develops a mathematical model of how subsurface reservoir uncertainty, in particular estimated ultimate recovery (EUR), can evolve over time. The model assumes that epistemic uncertainty reduces over time as information from seismic surveys, appraisal wells and production logs is used to improve EUR estimates. A reverse Wiener diffusion process with superimposed jumps is developed to capture the exponential decrease in estimate volatility due to learning but also the existence of sudden jumps in estimates due to unexpected discoveries such as reservoir fault lines or aquifer support. The model can be applied to quantify the evolution of reservoir uncertainty over time during appraisal and planning of new oil and gas development projects. Appreciation Factor data from 34 North Sea fields is used to calibrate and validate the model showing that the evolution of EUR estimates is predicted with 82.4% of validation data points within the simulated P10 and P90 uncertainty envelope, which should theoretically cover 80% of data points if there is no model error. The key parameters in the model are the initial EUR distribution, as well as the exponential decay rates for EUR volatility and the likelihood of occurrence of discrete jumps. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 19
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A methodology to evaluate an option to defer an oilfield development [J].
Abid, Fathi ;
Kaffel, Bilel .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 66 (1-2) :60-68
[2]   Incorporating technical uncertainty in real option valuation of oil projects [J].
Armstrong, M ;
Galli, A ;
Bailey, W ;
Couët, B .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 44 (1-2) :67-82
[3]   ANALYSIS OF DECLINE CURVES [J].
ARPS, JJ .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERS, 1945, 160 :228-247
[4]  
ARPS JJ, 1956, T AM I MIN MET ENG, V207, P182
[5]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[6]  
Caumon G., 2004, SPE ANN TECHN C EXH
[7]   Stochastic analysis of production decline data for production prediction and reserves estimation [J].
Chang, CP ;
Lin, ZS .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 (3-4) :149-160
[8]  
Copeland T., 2003, Real options: a practitioner's guide
[9]  
Demirmen F, 2007, J PETROL TECHNOL, V59, P80