How to Consider the Value of Farm Animals in Breeding Goals. A Review of Current Status and Future Challenges

被引:35
作者
Nielsen, H. M. [1 ]
Olesen, I. [1 ]
Navrud, S. [2 ]
Kolstad, K. [1 ]
Amer, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Nofima Marin, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Econ & Resource Management, N-1432 As, Norway
[3] AbacusBio Ltd, Dunedin 9058, New Zealand
关键词
Animal welfare; Breeding goal; Economic value; Market experiment; Non-market value; Public good; Willingness to pay; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; DAIRY-CATTLE; ECONOMIC VALUES; CONTINGENT VALUATION; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; FUNCTIONAL TRAITS; WELFARE; SELECTION; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1007/s10806-010-9264-4
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to outline challenges associated with the inclusion of welfare issues in breeding goals for farm animals and to review the currently available methodologies and discuss their potential advantages and limitations to address these challenges. The methodology for weighing production traits with respect to cost efficiency and market prices are well developed and implemented in animal breeding goals. However, these methods are inadequate in terms of assessing proper values of traits with social and ethical values such as animal welfare, because such values are unlikely to be readily available from the product prices and costs in the market. Defining breeding goals that take animal welfare and ethical concerns into account, therefore, requires new approaches. In this paper we suggest a framework and an approach for defining breeding goals, including animal welfare. The definition of breeding goals including values related to animal welfare requires a multidisciplinary approach with a combination of different methods such as profit equations, stated preference techniques, and selection index theory. In addition, a participatory approach involving different stakeholders such as breeding organizations, food authorities, farmers, and animal welfare organizations should be applied. We conclude that even though these methods provide the necessary tools for considering welfare issues in the breeding goal, the practical application of these methods is yet to be achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 330
页数:22
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Consumers' willingness to pay for the color of salmon: A choice experiment with real economic incentives [J].
Alfnes, Frode ;
Guttormsen, Atle G. ;
Steine, Gro ;
Kolstad, Kari .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (04) :1050-1061
[2]   Economic accounting of numbers of expressions and delays in sheep genetic improvement [J].
Amer, PR .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1999, 42 (03) :325-336
[3]  
Bateman I.J., 1999, VALUING ENV PREFEREN
[4]   The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) [J].
Bergsma, R. ;
Kanis, E. ;
Knol, E. F. ;
Bijma, P. .
GENETICS, 2008, 178 (03) :1559-1570
[5]  
Bijma P, 2007, GENETICS, V175, P277, DOI 10.1534/genetics.106.062711
[6]   DERIVATION OF ECONOMIC WEIGHTS FROM PROFIT EQUATIONS [J].
BRASCAMP, EW ;
SMITH, C ;
GUY, DR .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1985, 40 (FEB) :175-180
[7]   ANIMAL-WELFARE - CONCEPTS AND MEASUREMENT [J].
BROOM, DM .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 69 (10) :4167-4175
[8]   Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying preferences the same? [J].
Cameron, TA ;
Poe, GL ;
Ethier, RG ;
Schulze, WD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 44 (03) :391-425
[9]   Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment [J].
Carlsson, F ;
Martinsson, P .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 41 (02) :179-192
[10]  
Christensen LG, 1998, ACTA AGR SCAND A-AN, P77