Femoral Neck Stress Fracture: Can MRI Grade Help Predict Return-to-Running Time?

被引:20
作者
Ramey, Lindsay N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McInnis, Kelly C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Palmer, William E. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Charlestown, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Orthoped, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
femoral neck stress fracture; magnetic resonance imaging; rehabilitation; hip; stress fractures; RISK-FACTORS; INJURIES; BONE; MANAGEMENT; TRACK; PLAY; CLASSIFICATION; AGE; HIP;
D O I
10.1177/0363546516648319
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Limited research is available regarding return-to-running (RTR) time after femoral neck stress fractures. While studies have shown the prognostic value of image-based grading scales for stress fractures at other sites, few have included femoral neck stress fractures. Purpose: To determine if the grade of femoral neck stress fractures based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics correlates with RTR time. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 24 patients (mean age, 32.9 years; range, 18-51 years) who were diagnosed with 27 femoral neck stress fractures by MRI from 2009 to 2015 at a single sports medicine clinic. All fractures were compression sided and were treated nonoperatively. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics and RTR time. Images were graded from 1 to 4 using the Arendt stress fracture severity scale. Statistical analysis was performed using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model to compare the RTR time between grades. Cox regression was repeated, adjusted for age, bone mineral density (BMD), and body mass index (BMI). Results: The mean (standard error of the mean) RTR time in weeks for patients with fractures graded 1 to 4 was 7.4 +/- 2.7 (range, 4-11), 13.8 +/- 3.8 (range, 6-21), 14.7 +/- 3.5 (range, 8.5-24), and 17.5 +/- 3.4 (range, 10-32), respectively. Survival analysis indicated that there was a statistically significant effect of fracture grade on RTR time (P = .0065). The Cox model indicated a statistically significant difference in RTR time between grades 1 and 2 (P = .036), 1 and 3 (P = .014), and 1 and 4 (P = .002). The unadjusted hazard ratio was significant (P = .037). There were no statistically significant differences between the remaining grades (P = .82 for grades 2 and 3, P = .37 for grades 2 and 4, and P = .31 for grades 3 and 4). Age (P = .71) and BMD (P = .81) did not have an effect on RTR time. The hazard ratio remained significant (P = .05) after adjusting for age and BMD. BMI tended to have an effect on RTR time (P = .09). After adding BMI to the adjustment, the hazard ratio decreased in significance (P = .13), although sample size also decreased. Conclusion: Grade 2 to 4 femoral neck stress fractures require longer RTR time than do grade 1 injuries. Patients with lower BMI tend to require a longer RTR time.
引用
收藏
页码:2122 / 2129
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Stress injuries to bone in college athletes - A retrospective review of experience at a single institution [J].
Arendt, E ;
Agel, J ;
Heikes, C ;
Griffiths, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (06) :959-968
[2]   The use of mr imaging in the assessment and clinical management of stress reactions of bone in high-performance athletes [J].
Arendt, EA ;
Griffiths, HJ .
CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 1997, 16 (02) :291-&
[3]   Stress fractures and the female athlete [J].
Arendt, EA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2000, (372) :131-138
[4]   The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes - A twelve-month prospective study [J].
Bennell, KL ;
Malcolm, SA ;
Thomas, SA ;
Wark, JD ;
Brukner, PD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (02) :211-217
[5]   RISK-FACTORS FOR STRESS-FRACTURES IN FEMALE TRACK-AND-FIELD ATHLETES - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS [J].
BENNELL, KL ;
MALCOLM, SA ;
THOMAS, SA ;
EBELING, PR ;
MCCRORY, PR ;
WARK, JD ;
BRUKNER, PD .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 1995, 5 (04) :229-235
[6]  
Boden B P, 2000, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V8, P344
[7]  
BRUDVIG TJS, 1983, MIL MED, V148, P666
[8]  
Devas M B, 1965, J Bone Joint Surg Br, V47, P728
[9]   Classification and return-to-play considerations for stress fractures [J].
Diehl, JJ ;
Best, TM ;
Kaeding, CC .
CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (01) :17-+
[10]   Estimation of return-to-sports-time for athletes with stress fracture - an approach combining risk level of fracture site with severity based on imaging [J].
Dobrindt, Oliver ;
Hoffmeyer, Birgit ;
Ruf, Juri ;
Seidensticker, Max ;
Steffen, Ingo G. ;
Fischbach, Frank ;
Zarva, Alina ;
Wieners, Gero ;
Ulrich, Gerhard ;
Lohmann, Christoph H. ;
Amthauer, Holger .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2012, 13