Perceived risk of harm from cigarettes or smokeless tobacco among US high school seniors

被引:0
作者
Tomar, Scott L.
Hatsukami, Dorothy K.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Dent, Dept Community Dent & Behav Sci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Tobacco Use Res Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14622200701648417
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined perceived risk of harm from smoking or ST use in a U.S. nationally representative sample of high school seniors and examined its association with current smoking status. Data were derived from the Monitoring the Future project for 1999 through 2003 (n = 11,093). We used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the association between comparative perceived risk of harm of smoking and ST use with current smoking status, while adjusting for sex, race, and perceived risk of harm from smoking. In 1999-2003, 74.0% of high school seniors perceived great risk of harm from smoking and 44.9% perceived great risk from using ST. Perceived risk varied by smoking intensity: 80.3% of non-smokers perceived great risk of harm from smoking, compared to 49.7% of students who smoked about one-half pack per day and 36.1% of pack-a-day smokers. Overall, 52.7% perceived equal risk of harm from using either product, 41.3% perceived greater risk from cigarettes, and 6.1% perceived a greater risk from using ST. Adjusting for sex and race, high school seniors who perceived that smoking conveyed a greater risk for harm than did using smokeless tobacco were significantly More likely to be smokers than were those who perceived equal risk from the products (odds ratio [OR]= 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.60). Those who perceived that using smokeless tobacco was riskier than smoking were even more likely to be current smokers (OR=2.43; 95% CI 1.96-3.01). Effective methods for communicating accurate health risks to young people are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1196
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
BACHMAN JG, 2001, 54 I SOC RES
[2]   European Union policy on smokeless tobacco:: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health [J].
Bates, C ;
Fagerström, K ;
Jarvis, MJ ;
Kunze, M ;
McNeill, A ;
Ramström, L .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (04) :360-367
[3]  
CONRAD KM, 1992, BRIT J ADDICT, V87, P1711
[4]   Should the European Union lift the ban on snus?: Evidence from the Swedish experience [J].
Fagerström, KO ;
Schildt, EB .
ADDICTION, 2003, 98 (09) :1191-1195
[5]   Modified tobacco use and lifestyle change in risk-reducing beliefs about smoking [J].
Haddock, CK ;
Lando, H ;
Klesges, RC ;
Peterson, AL ;
Scarinci, IC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 27 (01) :35-41
[6]   Perceived risks and benefits of smoking: differences among adolescents with different smoking experiences and intentions [J].
Halpern-Felsher, BL ;
Biehl, M ;
Kropp, RY ;
Rubinstein, ML .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 39 (03) :559-567
[7]  
Hecht Stephen, 2005, Minn Med, V88, P40
[8]  
JOHNSTON LD, 2005, MONITORING FUTURE CO
[9]   Not safe is not enough: smokers have a right to know more than there is no safe tobacco product [J].
Kozlowski, LT ;
Edwards, BQ .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2005, 14 :II3-II7
[10]   Apply federal research rules on deception to misleading health information: An example on smokeless tobacco and cigarettes [J].
Kozlowski, LT ;
O'Connor, RJ .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2003, 118 (03) :187-192