Are tightened trading rules always bad? Evidence from the Chinese index futures market

被引:14
作者
Lin, Hai [1 ]
Wang, You [2 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Econ & Finance, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Econ, Dept Finance, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
Tightened trading rules; Index futures; Market efficiency; Price discovery; Manipulation; PRICE DISCOVERY; STOCK INDEX; VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS; REALIZED VOLATILITY; EXCHANGE-RATES; COINTEGRATION; EFFICIENCY; HYPOTHESIS; HETEROSKEDASTICITY; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1080/14697688.2018.1445586
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the impact of tightened trading rules on the market efficiency and price discovery function of the Chinese stock index futures in 2015. The market efficiency and the price discovery of Chinese stock index futures do not deteriorate after these rule changes. Using variance ratio and spectral shape tests, we find that the Chinese index futures market becomes even more efficient after the tightened rules came into effect. Furthermore, by employing Schwarz and Szakmary [J. Futures Markets, 1994, 14(2), 147-167] and Hasbrouck [J. Finance, 1995, 50(4), 1175-1199] price discovery measures, we find that the price discovery function, to some extent, becomes better. This finding is consistent with Stein [J. Finance, 2009, 64(4), 1517-1548], who documents that regulations on leverage can be helpful in a bad market state, and Zhu [Rev. Financ. Stud., 2014, 27(3), 747-789.], who finds that price discovery can be improved with reduced liquidity. It also suggests that the new rules may effectively regulate the manipulation behaviour of the Chinese stock index futures market during a bad market state, and then positively affect its market efficiency and price discovery function.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1470
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[2]   AN IMPROVED HETEROSKEDASTICITY AND AUTOCORRELATION CONSISTENT COVARIANCE-MATRIX ESTIMATOR [J].
ANDREWS, DWK ;
MONAHAN, JC .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (04) :953-966
[3]   COMMON STOCHASTIC TRENDS IN A SYSTEM OF EXCHANGE-RATES [J].
BAILLIE, RT ;
BOLLERSLEV, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1989, 44 (01) :167-181
[4]   Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns [J].
Baker, Malcolm ;
Wurgler, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (04) :1645-1680
[5]   Price discovery and trading after hours [J].
Barclay, MJ ;
Hendershott, T .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2003, 16 (04) :1041-1073
[6]   Econometric analysis of realized covariation: High frequency based covariance, regression, and correlation in financial economics [J].
Barndorff-Nielsen, OE ;
Shephard, N .
ECONOMETRICA, 2004, 72 (03) :885-925
[7]   TESTING THE UNBIASED FORWARD RATE HYPOTHESIS - EVIDENCE ON UNIT ROOTS, COINTEGRATION, AND STOCHASTIC COEFFICIENTS [J].
BARNHART, SW ;
SZAKMARY, AC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1991, 26 (02) :245-267
[8]   A note on execution costs for stock index futures: Information versus liquidity effects [J].
Berkman, H ;
Brailsford, T ;
Frino, A .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (03) :565-577
[9]   COINTEGRATION - SOME RESULTS ON UNITED-STATES CATTLE PRICES [J].
BESSLER, DA ;
COVEY, T .
JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 1991, 11 (04) :461-474
[10]  
Booth GG, 1999, J FUTURES MARKETS, V19, P619, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199909)19:6<619::AID-FUT1>3.0.CO