A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire

被引:63
作者
Kleinman, L
Leidy, NK
Crawley, J
Bonomi, A
Schoenfeld, P
机构
[1] MEDTAP Int Inc, Ctr Hlth Outcomes Res, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
[2] AstraZeneca LP, Wayne, PA USA
[3] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[4] Natl Naval Med Ctr, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
health-related quality of life; computer administration; psychometric characteristics;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-200102000-00008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND. Although most health-related quality of life questionnaires are self-administered by means of paper and pencil, new technologies for automated computer administration are becoming more readily available. Novel methods of instrument administration must be assessed for score equivalence in addition to consistency in reliability and validity. OBJECTIVES. The present study compared the psychometric characteristics (score equivalence and structure, internal consistency, and reproducibility reliability and construct validity) of the Quality of Life in Reflux And Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire when self-administered by means of paper and pencil versus touch-screen computer. The influence of age, education, and prior experience with computers on score equivalence was also examined. RESEARCH DESIGN. This crossover trial randomized 134 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease to 1 of 2 groups: paper-and-pencil questionnaire administration followed by computer administration or computer administration followed by use of paper and pencil. To minimize learning effects and respondent fatigue, administrations were scheduled 3 days apart. A random sample of 32 patients participated in a 1-week reproducibility evaluation of the computer-administered QOLRAD. RESULTS. QOLRAD scores were equivalent across the 2 methods of administration regardless of subject age, education, and prior computer use. Internal consistency levels were very high (alpha = 0.93-0.99). Interscale correlations were strong and generally consistent across methods (r = 0.75-0.87). Correlations between the QOLRAD and Short Form 36 (SF-36) were high, with no significant differences by method. Test-retest reliability of the computer-administered QOLRAD was also very high (ICC = 0.93-0.96). CONCLUSIONS. Results of the present study suggest that the QOLRAD is reliable and valid when self-administered by means of computer touch-screen or paper and pencil.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 189
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] BURKE JD, 1995, INT J METHOD PSYCH, V5, P189
  • [2] Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life.
    Buxton, J
    White, M
    Osoba, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (06) : 513 - 519
  • [3] Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
  • [4] User preferences for computer administration of quality of life instruments
    Crawley, JA
    Kleinman, L
    Dominitz, J
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2000, 34 (01): : 137 - 144
  • [5] ELECTRONIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRES - A COMPARISON OF PEN-BASED ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRES WITH CONVENTIONAL PAPER IN A GASTROINTESTINAL STUDY
    DRUMMOND, HE
    GHOSH, S
    FERGUSON, A
    BRACKENRIDGE, D
    TIPLADY, B
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1995, 4 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [7] Kissinger P, 1999, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V149, P950, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009739
  • [8] Telephone validation of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 (QOLIE-89)
    Leidy, NK
    Elixhauser, A
    Rentz, AM
    Beach, R
    Pellock, J
    Schachter, S
    Willian, MK
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 1999, 40 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [9] Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, V2
  • [10] The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life
    Revicki, DA
    Wood, M
    Maton, PN
    Sorensen, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 104 (03) : 252 - 258