Benefits of low vision aids to reading accessibility

被引:12
作者
Latham, Keziah [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Dept Vis & Hearing Sci, East Rd, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England
[2] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Vis & Eye Res Unit, Cambridge, England
关键词
Reading; Vision tests; Visual impairment; Low vision; Sensory aids; Rehabilitation; VISUAL FUNCTION; OPTICAL MAGNIFIERS; MNREAD; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The Reading Accessibility Index (ACC) has been proposed as a single-value reading parameter that can capture information on both reading speed and print sizes that can be read. It is defined as the average reading speed across a relevant range of print sizes (1.3-0.4logMAR), normalised by typical young-adult reading speed of 200 wpm, and with values typically in the range of 0-1. This study determines the impact of low vision aids (LVAs) on reading by evaluating ACC values for visually impaired observers reading both without and with an optical LVA. A secondary analysis of previously published data obtained from 100 visually impaired observers attending low vision assessments was undertaken. Observers had mixed causes of visual impairment but predominantly macular degeneration. All used an LVA for reading, with 88% using it 'often' or 'very often'. MNREAD reading parameters, including ACC, were determined both for reading without an LVA (clinical function) and with the LVA habitually used for reading (aided function). There was a significant improvement in ACC from clinical (0.31) to aided conditions (0.47). Average improvement in ACC with an LVA was 0.16, but the benefits of LVAs in terms of improvement in ACC could not be predicted from clinical visual function. Even with an LVA reading accessibility is, on average, markedly reduced from normal levels. The ACC is a potentially valuable outcome measure for reading rehabilitation interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 52
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Reading with optical magnifiers: page navigation strategies and difficulties [J].
Bowers, Alex ;
Cheong, Allen M. Y. ;
Lovie-Kitchin, Jan E. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (01) :9-20
[2]   Eye movements and reading with large print and optical magnifiers in macular disease [J].
Bowers, AR ;
Lovie-Kitchin, JE ;
Woods, RL .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2001, 78 (05) :325-334
[3]   Comparing performance on the MNREAD iPad application with the MNREAD acuity chart [J].
Calabrese, Aurelie ;
To, Long ;
He, Yingchen ;
Berkholtz, Elizabeth ;
Rafian, Paymon ;
Legge, Gordon E. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2018, 18 (01)
[4]   Baseline MNREAD Measures for Normally Sighted Subjects From Childhood to Old Age [J].
Calabrese, Aurelie ;
Cheong, Allen M. Y. ;
Cheung, Sing-Hang ;
He, Yingchen ;
Kwon, MiYoung ;
Mansfield, J. Stephen ;
Subramanian, Ahalya ;
Yu, Deyue ;
Legge, Gordon E. .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (08) :3836-3843
[5]   Development of a Reading Accessibility Index Using the MNREAD Acuity Chart [J].
Calabrese, Aurelie ;
Owsley, Cynthia ;
McGwin, Gerald ;
Legge, Gordon E. .
JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 134 (04) :398-405
[6]   Fixation stability and reading speed in patients with newly developed macular disease [J].
Crossland, MD ;
Culham, LE ;
Rubin, GS .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2004, 24 (04) :327-333
[7]  
Hazel CA, 2000, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V41, P1309
[8]   Guidelines for Predicting Performance with Low Vision Aids [J].
Latham, Keziah ;
Tabrett, Daryl R. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2012, 89 (09) :1316-1326
[9]  
Legge G., 2007, PSYCHOPHYSICS READIN, V1st
[10]   Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography [J].
Legge, Gordon E. ;
Bigelow, Charles A. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2011, 11 (05)