A quantitative comparison between electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation for boron removal from boron-containing solution

被引:143
作者
Yilmaz, A. Erdem [1 ]
Boncukcuoglu, Recep
Kocakerim, M. Muhtar
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Environm Engn, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
electrocoagulation; chemical coagulation; boron removal; aluminum;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a quantitative comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation approaches based on boron removal. Electrocoagulation process delivers the coagulant in situ as the sacrificial anode corrodes, due to a fixed current density, while the simultaneous evolution of hydrogen at the cathode allows for pollutant removal by flotation. By comparison, conventional chemical coagulation typically adds a salt of the coagulant, with settling providing the primary pollutant removal path. Chemical coagulation was carried out via jar tests using aluminum chloride. Comparison was done with the same amount of coagulant between electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation processes. Boron removal obtained was higher with electrocoagulation process. In addition, it was seen that chemical coagulation has any effect for boron removal from boron-containing solution. At optimum conditions (e.g. pH 8.0 and aluminum dose of 7.45 g/L), boron removal efficiencies for electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation were 94.0% and 24.0%, respectively. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 481
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Nutrient removal and sludge production in the coagulation-flocculation process [J].
Aguilar, MI ;
Sáez, J ;
Lloréns, M ;
Soler, A ;
Ortuño, JF .
WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (11) :2910-2919
[2]   Coagulation of polymeric wastewater discharged by a chemical factory [J].
Al-Malack, MH ;
Abuzaid, NS ;
El-Mubarak, AH .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (02) :521-529
[3]   Coagulant selection and sludge conditioning in a slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant [J].
Al-Mutairi, NZ ;
Hamoda, MF ;
Al-Ghusain, I .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 95 (02) :115-119
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, STANDARD POTENTIALS
[5]   Separation of pollutants from restaurant wastewater by electrocoagulation [J].
Chen, XM ;
Chen, GH ;
Yue, PL .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 19 (1-2) :65-76
[6]   THE OPERATING COST OF ELECTROCOAGULATION [J].
DONINI, JC ;
KAN, J ;
SZYNKARCZUK, J ;
HASSAN, TA ;
KAR, KL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 72 (06) :1007-1012
[7]   Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts [J].
Duan, JM ;
Gregory, J .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2003, 100 :475-502
[8]  
Eckenfelder W.W., 1989, Industrial Water Pollution Control
[9]   A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation [J].
Holt, PK ;
Barton, GW ;
Wark, M ;
Mitchell, CA .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2002, 211 (2-3) :233-248
[10]   The effects of pH on phosphate removal from wastewater by electrocoagulation with iron plate electrodes [J].
Irdemez, Sahset ;
Demircioglu, Nuhi ;
Yildiz, Yalcin Sevki .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 137 (02) :1231-1235