For a Kantian rereading of the principle of causality

被引:0
作者
Cicatello, Angelo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dipartimento Sci Umanist, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
来源
ANUARIO FILOSOFICO | 2018年 / 51卷 / 03期
关键词
Kant; principles; causality; time; alteration; HUME;
D O I
10.15581/009.51.3.485-513
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
There is no contradiction between Kant's statement that the proposition, "every alteration has its cause," is of no interest to the Critique of Pure Reason because of its dependence on empirical contents (KrV, B 3) and his use of the same proposition as an example of pure a priori knowledge (KrV, B 5). There is only the arduousness and sometimes also the ambiguity of a passage in which Kant attempts to establish a new basis for the validity of the principle of causality.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 513
页数:29
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] ALLISON HE, 1994, U W ONT PHI, V54, P291
  • [2] Amoroso L., 1984, SENSO CONSENSO STUDI
  • [3] [Anonymous], P ARISTOTELIAN SOC
  • [4] Breitenbach A, 2011, ROUTL ADV HIST PHILO, V3, P201
  • [5] CRAMER K., 1976, ACT C OTT KANT TRAD, P364
  • [6] Cramer K., 1972, P 3 INT KANT C, P246
  • [7] FERRARIN A., 2011, CRITICA RAGIONE FENO, P395
  • [8] Goria G, 2015, ESTUD KANTIANOS, V3, P119
  • [9] Guyer Paul., 1987, KANT CLAIMS KNOWLEDG
  • [10] Kopper Joachim, 1970, KANT-STUD, V61, P289