A Progressive Hedging Approach to Solve Harvest Scheduling Problem under Climate Change

被引:10
作者
Garcia-Gonzalo, Jordi [1 ,2 ]
Pais, Cristobal [3 ,4 ]
Bachmatiuk, Joanna [2 ]
Barreiro, Susana [2 ]
Weintraub, Andres [3 ]
机构
[1] Forest Sci & Technol Ctr Catalonia, Solsona 08930, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Agron, Ctr Estudos Florestais, P-1500020 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Chile, Ingn Ind, Santiago 7591538, Chile
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, 4IEOR Dept, Berkeley, CA 95101 USA
来源
FORESTS | 2020年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
stochastic programming; progressive hedging; harvest scheduling; adjacency constraints; ADAPTIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; GROWTH; RESTRICTIONS; TOOLBOX; LEVEL; STAND; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/f11020224
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Due to the long time horizon typically characterizing forest planning, uncertainty plays an important role when developing forest management plans. Especially important is the uncertainty related to recently human-induced global warming since it has a clear impact on forest capacity to contribute to biogenic and anthropogenic ecosystem services. If the forest manager ignores uncertainty, the resulting forest management plan may be sub-optimal, in the best case. This paper presents a methodology to incorporate uncertainty due to climate change into forest management planning. Specifically, this paper addresses the problem of harvest planning, i.e., defining which stands are to be cut in each planning period in order to maximize expected net revenues, considering several climate change scenarios. This study develops a solution approach for a planning problem for a eucalyptus forest with 1000 stands located in central Portugal where expected future conditions are anticipated by considering a set of climate scenarios. The model including all the constraints that link all the scenarios and spatial adjacency constraints leads to a very large problem that can only be solved by decomposing it into scenarios. For this purpose, we solve the problem using Progressive Hedging (PH) algorithm, which decomposes the problem into scenario sub-problems easier to solve. To analyze the performance of PH versus the use of the extensive form (EF), we solve several instances of the original problem using both approaches. Results show that PH outperforms the EF in both solving time and final optimality gap. In addition, the use of PH allows to solve the most difficult problems while the commercial solvers are not able to solve the EF. The approach presented allows the planner to develop more robust management plans that incorporate the uncertainty due to climate change in their plans.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Climate-sensitive modelling of site-productivity relationships for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) [J].
Albert, M. ;
Schmidt, M. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 259 (04) :739-749
[2]   BFC, A branch-and-fix coordination algorithmic framework for solving some types of stochastic pure and mixed 0-1 programs [J].
Alonso-Ayuso, A ;
Escudero, LF ;
Ortuño, MT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 151 (03) :503-519
[3]   Forestry management under uncertainty [J].
Alonso-Ayuso, Antonio ;
Escudero, Laureano F. ;
Guignard, Monique ;
Quinteros, Martin ;
Weintraub, Andres .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2011, 190 (01) :17-39
[4]   A multicriteria optimization model for sustainable forest management under climate change uncertainty: An application in Portugal [J].
Alvarez-Miranda, Eduardo ;
Garcia-Gonzalo, Jordi ;
Ulloa-Fierro, Felipe ;
Weintraub, Andres ;
Barreiro, Susana .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 269 (01) :79-98
[5]   A problem of forest harvesting and road building solved through model strengthening and Lagrangean relaxation [J].
Andalaft, N ;
Andalaft, P ;
Guignard, M ;
Magendzo, A ;
Wainer, A ;
Weintraub, A .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 51 (04) :613-628
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REPORT EUROPEAN COMM
[7]   Stochastic optimization models in forest planning: a progressive hedging solution approach [J].
Badilla Veliz, Fernando ;
Watson, Jean-Paul ;
Weintraub, Andres ;
Wets, Roger J. -B. ;
Woodruff, David L. .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 232 (01) :259-274
[8]  
Birge J.R., 2011, INTRO STOCHASTIC PRO, P181, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0237-4, 10.1007/978-1-4614-0237-4]
[9]  
Christensen JH, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P847
[10]   Progressive Hedging-Based Metaheuristics for Stochastic Network Design [J].
Crainic, Teodor Gabriel ;
Fu, Xiaorui ;
Gendreau, Michel ;
Rei, Walter ;
Wallace, Stein W. .
NETWORKS, 2011, 58 (02) :114-124