Three-year follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class 111 malocclusion: Stability and risk factors for relapse

被引:78
作者
Jakobsone, Gundega [2 ]
Stenvik, Arild [1 ]
Sandvik, Leiv [3 ]
Espeland, Lisen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Dent, Dept Orthodont, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[2] Riga Stradins Univ, Dept Orthodont, Riga, Latvia
[3] Univ Oslo, Fac Dent, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
CLASS-III MALOCCLUSION; FORT-I OSTEOTOMY; MANDIBULAR PROCEDURES; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; COMBINED MAXILLARY; ADVANCEMENT; FIXATION; TITANIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.050
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term skeletal and occlusal stability after bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion. Methods: The sample comprised 81 consecutively treated patients. All subjects had received a combined 1-piece LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split ostotomies with rigid fixation between 1990 and 2003 and were followed for 3 years. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before surgery and at 5 occasions after surgery. Results: The mean setback was 6.9 mm in the mandible, and the maxilla was moved forward 3.7 mm. In most patients, the posterior maxilla was impacted. Relapse of maxillary advancement was insignificant (0.1 mm), whereas relapse at B-point was on average 1.7 mm (P <0.010). After 3 years, mean overjet and overbite amounts were 2.0 and 1.9 mm, respectively. Skeletal relapse of the mandible increased significantly with the surgical setback (P<0.001) and the change in the vertical position of the posterior maxilla (P-0.010) (multivariate regression analysis). Conclusions: Bimaxillary surgery resulted in good occlusal stability. Maxillary advancement was stable, whereas relapse of the mandibular setback varied. Risk factors for horizontal relapse of the mandible were large setback and inferior repositioning of the posterior maxilla. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139:80-9)
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Arpornmaeklong Premjit, 2003, Aust Orthod J, V19, P57
[2]  
Bailey L J, 2001, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V16, P280
[3]  
Bailey L J, 1998, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V13, P35
[4]  
Bailey L T, 1995, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V10, P108
[5]   Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy with advancement: A comparison of single maxillary surgery and a two-jaw procedure [J].
Bothur, S ;
Blomqvist, JE ;
Isaksson, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (09) :1029-1033
[6]  
Busby Bret R, 2002, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V17, P159
[7]   Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment [J].
Choi, HS ;
Rebellato, J ;
Yoon, HJ ;
Lund, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (07) :908-916
[8]   Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: Titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation [J].
Costa, F ;
Robiony, M ;
Zorzan, E ;
Zerman, N ;
Politi, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (04) :642-651
[9]  
Costa F, 2001, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V16, P179
[10]  
Costa F, 2000, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V15, P197